Disposed

Kamlesh Laxkar and Ors. v. State Panchayati Raj Dep Ors.

Rajasthan HC11 May 2017CW/7246/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Coordinate Bench adjudication makes the writ application no longer res-integra. Court disposed of proceedings by directing petitioners to submit a comprehensive representation enclosing a copy of the prior order for the State-respondents to decide within ten weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to file comprehensive representation; respondents directed to decide by reasoned order within ten weeks.

Kamlesh Laxkar and Ors. Vs State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2017)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7246 / 2017

¶3

Kamlesh Laxkar S/o Shri Satyanarayan Laxkar,, Aged About 43 Years, Deen Dayal Colony, Newai, District Tonk (Raj.) At Present Working As Panchayat Extension Officer At Panchayat Samiti Newai District Tonk (Raj.)

¶4

Hansraj Meena S/o Shri Rameshwar Prasad Meena,, Aged About 43 Years, Village Jagsara Post Datwas, Tehsil Newai, District Tonk (Raj.). At Present Working As Panchayat Extension Officer At Panchayat Samiti Newai District Tonk (Raj.)

¶5

Chiranji Lal Meena S/o Shri Dhanpal Meena,, Aged About 49 Years, Village Sholatpura Post Mandawara Tehsil Uniyara, District Tonk (Raj.). At Present Working As Panchayat Extension Officer At Panchayat Samiti Newai District Tonk (Raj.)

¶6

Puran Mal S/o Shri Ram Chandra,, Aged About 42 Years, Village & Post Mehara-Jatuwas Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) At Present Working As Panchayat Extension Officer At Panchayat Samiti Newai District Tonk (Raj.)

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State of Rajasthan Through Commissioner, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj. Department,, Jaipur

¶10

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Tonk (Raj.)

¶11

Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Newai District Tonk (Raj.)

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak

¶14

For Respondent(s) :

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA

¶16

Order

¶17

11/05/2017

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, submits that the controversy raised in the instant writ application is no more res-integra in view of the adjudication made by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ petition Number

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[CW-7246/2017]

¶21

733 of 2009 : Jagdish Bhanoda v. State of Rajasthan & Ors., decided on 29^th July, 2009.

¶22

It is further contended that for the present; the petitioners would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners, within a time frame, which they are ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.

¶23

In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioners to address a comprehensive representation enclosing a copy of the order in the case of Jagdish Bhanoda (supra).

¶24

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than ten weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.

¶25

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.

¶26

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.

¶27

SS/109

Kamlesh Laxkar and Ors. v. State Panchayati Raj Dep Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamlesh Laxkar and Ors. v. State Panchayati Raj Dep Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Girdhari Lal Vs U O I and Ors.

Rajendra Sharma Vs Lalit Kothari

Banshidhar Verma Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Bheru Singh Vs State of Rajasthan through P P

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Smt Soni Devi

Balram Jakhar @ Bachchiya Vs State of Rajasthan through P P