Dismissed
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt Soni Devi
Rajasthan HCCMA/98/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR…
What the court decided
AI extract
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 98 / 2011
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd
----Appellant
Versus
Smt Soni Devi
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr.Rishipal Agrawal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Judgment / Order
11/05/2017
This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and award under appeal.
Brief facts of the case are that an accident occurred in the present case and with regard to an accident, a claim petition was filed on behalf of the claimant/s claiming compensation as mentioned therein. Notices were issued to the opposite parties. Reply to the claim petition was filed and the learned Tribunal framed the issues. After hearing all the parties, the learned Tribunal passed the aforesaid impugned judgment & award under appeal.
Against the impugned judgment and award under appeal, the appellant preferred the instant appeal for the relief as prayed for in it.
(2 of 5)
[CMA-98/2011]
Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that the learned Tribunal has failed to appreciate each and every aspect of the matter as also the evidence available on record. The award passed by the learned Tribunal is illegal, without jurisdiction and contrary to the facts of the case. Hence impugned award deserves to be modified/enhanced.
I have heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the impugned judgment and award under appeal. I am in agreement with the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal, which are reproduced as under:-
fook|d la- 4 %&
bl fook|d dks lkfcr djus dk Hkkj izkFkhZx.k ij gSA ;g r; fd;k tkuk gS fd os fdruk izfrdj izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gS loZizFke erd dh vk;q dk fu/kkZj.k fd;k tkuk gSA erd dh iRuh izk- lk- lksuh nsoh us vius ifr dh ?kVuk ds le; vk;q 45 o"kZ gksuk crkbZ gS ftldh iqf"V iksLVekVZe fjiksVZ izn’kZ&4 ls gks jgh gSA bl rF; dks pqukSrh foi{kh }kjk ugha nh xbZ gS blfy, nq?kZVuk ds le; e`rd dh vk;q 45 o"kZ gksuk r; dh tk jgh gSA
;g r; fd;k tkuk gS fd e`rd dh D;k vk;q Fkh] lk{kh izklk- A Jherh lksuhnsoh ds vuqlkj mlds ifr fidvi osu la- & vkjts-01 th&4314 j[krk Fkk vkSj ,d LFkku ls nwljs LFkku ij lkeku
(3 of 5)
[CMA-98/2011]
VªkaliksVZ djds 8]000@& :i;s ekfld dekrk FkkA erd ds uke ls osu Fkh ftldk jftLVªs’ku izek.k i= izn’kZ&13 , izLrqr gqvk gS ftlls ;g lkfcr gksrk gS fd erd mDr osu dk ekfyd FkkA ;g osu eky okgd okgu ds :i esa jftLVMZ gSA vr% izkFkhZuh dk dFku fo’oluh; gks tkrk gS fd mldk ifr eky okgd osu dk ekfyd Fkk vkSj lkeku VªkaliksVZs’ku dk dk;Z djrk FkkA erd ds ifjokj esa erd lfgr 8 lnL; FksA ,slh ifjfLFkfr esa mldh vk; bruh Fkh fd og 8 lnL;ksa dks ikyrk FkkA vk; dks lkfcr djus ds fy, dksbZ foLrr fooj.k ugha fn;k x;k gSA lk/kkj.kr;k DysesaV dh ;g lk/kkj.k izofr gksrh gS fd Dyse jkf’k vf/kd ls vf/kd izkIr djus ds fy, os erd dh vk; dks vf/kd crkrs gSA eSa foLrr fooj.k ds vHkko esa bl rF; dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, fd e`rd ds ifjokj esa 8 lnL; Fks vkSj og osu ekfyd Fkk ftlds tfj;s Lo;a VªkaliksVsZ’ku dk dk;Z djrk Fkk mldh vk; 6]000@& :i;s ekfld gksuk r; dj jgk gwWA]-------------
vc ;g r; fd;k tkuk gS fd fdrus dk xq.kd yxk;k tkuk pkfg, erd dh vk;q 45 o"kZ gksuk r; dh xbZ gSA eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&163 , esa nh xbZ f}rh; vuqlwph ds vuqlkj 40 ls 45 o"kZ rd ds erd ds fy, 15 dk xq.kd yxk;s tkus dk izko/kku gSA vr% eSa izkFkhZx.k dks U;k;ksfpr izfrdj fnykus ds fy, 15 dk xq.kd yxk;k tkuk mfpr le> jgk gwWA QyLo:i izfrdj dh
jkf’k 4]500x12x15=8]10]000@& :i;s vkrh gSA izk-la- 1 e`rd dh iRuh gS] tks fd vius ifr ds lq[k o lgp;Z ls oafpr gqbZ gS o
(4 of 5)
[CMA-98/2011]
izkFkhZx.k 2 ls 7 erd ds iq= iqf=;ka gS tks fd vius firk ds ykM+] I;kj ls oafpr gq, gS blfy, eSa ekuuh; jkt- mPp U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; 2004 ¼2½ Mh-,u-ts- ¼jkt-½ 618 U;w bf.M;k chek daiuh teuknsoh dh jks’kuh esa izk-la- 1 dks 20]000@& :i;s o vU; izR;sd izkFkhZ dks 10&10 gtkj :i;s dqy feykdj bl en esa 80]000@& :i;s dh jkf’k fnyk gjk gwWA erd dk nkg laLdkj Hkh fd;k x;k Fkk ftl isVs dkQh jkf’k [kpZ gksrh gS ijUrq eSa bl en eas ;qfDr ;qDr jkf’k 5]000@& :i;s fnyk jgk gWwA erd dh ekSr ? kVuk LFky ij ugha gqbZ Fkh cfYd mldk vLirky esa bykt pyk FkkA bykt ds nkSjku tks VSLV djk;s x;s muds fcy izn’kZ&14 o 15 izLrqr fd, x, gS ftudk ;ksx 350@& :i;s vkrk gSA ?kVuk jkf= dks 8-30 cts ds vklikl gqbZ Fkh 5&6 ?k.Vs bykt ds mijkar erd dh e`R;q gqbZ FkhA esjk ;g vuqeku gS fd de ls de 1]000@& :i;s dh jkf’k mlds bykt ij bl nkSjku [kpZ gqbZ gksxhA vr% eSa bykt isVs 1]000@& :i;s dh jkf’k fnyk jgk gwWA QyLo:i ftu&ftu enksa esa izkFkhZx.k dks izfrdj fnyk;k x;k gS mu jkf’k;ksa dk ;ksx 8]96]000@& :i;s vkrk gS ftls os izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSA bl izdkj bl fook|d dk fu.kZ; izkFkhZx.k ds i{k esa fd;k tkrk gSA
Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the findings arrived at by learned Tribunal as quoted herein above, the learned Tribunal is found to have dealt with each and every aspect of the matter, and has rightly passed the impugned
(5 of 5)
[CMA-98/2011]
judgment and award. I am in unison with the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal. Hence, I do not think it just and proper to interfere with the impugned award under appeal passed by the Tribunal, and thus the appeal having no force, is hereby dismissed after confirming the judgment and award under appeal passed by the learned Tribunal.
(MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA) J.
sandeep/-229
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd
Smt Soni Devi
Mahesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court