Petitioners sought to withdraw their writ petitions with liberty to file a fresh one. The High Court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn and also stayed of related petitions.
Petitioners granted liberty to file fresh writ petition if occasion arises; stay petitions dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4942 / 2017
Jeeva Ram S/o Sh. Khimaram Suthar, Aged About 50 Years, By Caste Suthar, Resident of Sutharo Ki Gali, Takhatgarh (Raj.) Pali.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4946 / 2017
Pukhraj Mewara S/o Sh. Moda Ramji, Aged About 66 Years, By Caste Mewara, Resident of Mahaveer Bagh, Takhatgarh (Raj.) Pali.
----Petitioner
Versus
2 Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Takhatgarh, District Pali.
----Respondents
_____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harish Purohit
For Respondent(s) : Dr. Pratishtha Dave
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
10/07/2017
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw these
(2 of 2)
[CW-4942/2017]
writ petitions, however, seeks liberty for the petitioners to file fresh writ petition if occasions so arises.
Hence, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
Stay petitions also stand dismissed.
(VIJAY BISHNOI)J.
Abhishek Kumar
S.Nos.97-98
Jeeva Ram S/o Sh. Khimaram Suthar
Pukhraj Mewara S/o Sh. Moda Ramji
Municipal Board, Takhatgarh
Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Takhatgarh
Vijay Bishnoi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
