Dismissed

Natti Bai and Ors. v. Chhotulal

Rajasthan HC9 Mar 2017CW/2609/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of miscellaneous writ petitions challenging the finality of orders by Constitutional Benches. The Division Bench held that since no new or emerging material facts were placed on record to challenge the materiality of the High Courts' findings, no interference under Article 227 was warranted. All petitions were dismissed as non-maintainable.

What did the court decide?

The writ petitions were dismissed as non-maintainable, and the proceedings were closed.

Natti Bai and Ors. Vs Chhotulal — Land Acquisition | Rajasthan HC (2017)

¶1

S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 2609 / 2017

¶2

¶3

jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqj

¶4

S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 2609 / 2017

¶5

Natti Bai W/o Gopal, B/c Bairwa

¶6

Yadram S/o Ramnath, B/c Meghwal

¶7

Rajendra S/o Ramkaran, B/c Dhakad

¶8

Badrilal S/o Gopilal, B/c Meena

¶9

Jagdish Prasad S/o Pannalal, B/c Nayak

¶10

Jaswant Kumar S/o Prathviraj, B/c Meena

¶11

Rameshwar S/o Gopal, B/c Meghwal

¶12

Ramsingh S/o Tophon Singh, B/c Kushwah

¶13

Bhanwarlal S/o Kishanlal, B/c Dhakad

¶14

Dilip Gaur S/o Rampratap, B/c Nayak,, All R/o Pratap Colony, Jhalawar Road, Baran, Tehsil & District Baran (Raj.)

¶15

----Petitioners

¶16

Versus

¶17

Chhotulal S/o Gangaram, B/c Gaur Khati,, Pratap Colony, Jhalawad Road, Baran

¶18

----Respondent

¶19

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh

¶20

;kphx.k ds vf/koDrk Jh v'khUnz xkSre o fot; y{eh xkSreA v;kph ds vf/koDrk Jh eqds'k iwfu;kA

¶21

S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 2609 / 2017

¶22

¶23

%% vkns'k %% 09-3-2017

¶24

;g fjV ;kfpdk fo}ku v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; ftyk U;k;k/kh'k] ckajk }kjk nhokuh fofo/k vihy la[;k 40@16 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 4-1-2017 o v/khuLFk U;k;ky; flfoy U;k;k/kh'k] ckjka }kjk nhokuh fofo/k la[;k 27@16 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 8-11-2016 ds fo:) izLrqr dh x;h gSA

¶25

fjV ;kfpdk ds xzg.kkFkZ izdze ij lquk x;kA

¶26

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dk dFku gS fd nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa }kjk ekSds dh okLrfod fLFkfr dks /;ku esa ugha j[kdj vk{ksfir vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us ekSdk dfe'uj fjiksVZ dks Hkh /;ku esa ugha j[kk gS tcfd ekSdk dfe'uj fjiksVZ ls ekSds ij jkLrk gksuk izdV gksrk gS ftlds layXu uD'ks esa 20 QhV pkSMk jkLrk vafdr gS ftl dkj.k lHkh vkus tkus okys yksxksa ds fgr izHkkfor gksrs gSaA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ek= rduhdh vk/kkj ij vk{ksfir vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gS] tks vikLr fd;k tkos rFkk foi{khx.k dks ekSds dh ;FkkfLFkfr cuk;s j[kus gsrq ikcUn fd;k tkosA

¶27

fo}ku vf/koDrk v;kphx.k dk dFku gS fd ;kph dh vksj ls lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 227 ds rgr ;g fjV ;kfpdk izLrqr dh x;h gS ftlesa U;k;ky; dks cgqr gh lhfer o fo'ks"kkf/kdkj dk mi;ksx djus dk vf/kdkj gSA nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa }kjk izdj.k esa izFken`"V;k ekeyk ugha ekuk gS rFkk v;kphx.k }kjk v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa tks nLrkost izLrqr fd;s x;s gSa os iwoZ fo"k; oLrq ls lacaf/kr vU; U;k;ky;ksa ds fu"d"kZ gS ftUgsa vU; fdlh U;k;ky; esa pqukSrh ugha nh x;h gSA vr%

¶28

S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 2609 / 2017

¶29

¶30

iwoZ esa ikfjr fu.kZ; vafre gks pqds gSA vr% fjV ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkosA

¶31

nksuksa i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k }kjk izLrqr rdksZa ij euu ,oa fopkj fd;k x;k A

¶32

Lohdr :i ls] bl U;k;ky; dks lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 227 ds rgr fdUgha fo'ks"k ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa tcfd nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa }kjk ,slk dksbZ vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gks tks lkoZtfud fgrksa o rF;ksa ds foijhr gks vFkok vkns'k esa ,slh dksbZ vfu;ferrk o voS/kkfudrk dh x;h gks ftlls fd izFken"V;k fdlh i{kdkj ds vf/kdkjksa dk vfrdze.k gksrk gks] lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 227 ds rgr iznRr vf/kdkjksa dks mi;ksx esa fy;k tk ldrk gSA

¶33

tgka rd izFken"V;k ekeys dk iz'u gS] Lohdr :i ls nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'kksa ls izdV gksrk gS fd ;kph us tks nLrkost v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;s gSa muesa ls ,slk dksbZ nLrkost muds i{k esa ugha gS ftlls fd izFken"V;k ekeyk ;kph ds i{k dk ekuk tk ldrk gksA ;g Hkh Lohdr fLFkfr gS fd fookfnr Hkwfe ckcr vU; U;k;ky;ksa ls eqdneksa dk fuLrkj.k gqvk gS ftlesa lacaf/kr Hkwfe ckcr pkgs x;s vuqrks"k ds dze esa vLFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk dk izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k x;k gS rFkk lacaf/kr dysDVj }kjk Hkh mDr Hkwfe dks jkLrk ugha ekuk x;k gS ,oa mDr vkns'kksa dks dgha Hkh pqukSrh nsdj vikLr ugha djk;k x;k gSA ;kuh dh izFken`"V;k ekeys ds leFkZu esa ;kph ds ikl fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ nLrkosth lk{; miyC/k ugha gSA ogha v;kphx.k dh vksj ls mu nLrkostksa dks U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] ftlls fd fookfnr Hkwfe ij v;kphx.k dk ekfydkuk gd izekf.kr gksrk gksA

¶34

S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 2609 / 2017

¶35

¶36

tgka rd ekSdk dfe'uj fjiksVZ dks mi;ksx esa fy;s tkus dk iz'u gS] Lohdr :i ls] ekSdk dfe'uj fjiksVZ esa miyC/k rF; ek= vLFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk ds izkFkZuk i= ds fuLrkj.k esa lgk;d gks ldrs gS] ysfdu tgka lcaf/kr Hkw&Hkkx ds dze esa U;k;ky;ksa }kjk viuk fu"d"kZ ns fn;k x;k gS ogka ekSdk dfe'uj fjiksVZ dks mu fu.kZ;ksa dh jks'kuh esa vf/kd o fu"d"kZ ls gVdj egRo ugha fn;k tk ldrk gSA bl U;k;ky; ds er e **sa** ] nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'kksa esa ,slh dksbZ =qfV fd;k tkuk izdV ugha gksrk gS ftlls izFken"V;k ekeyk ;kph ds i{k esa gksuk ugha ekudj gh vLFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk izkFkZuk i= o vihy [kkfjt dh x;h gS] tks iw.kZr% U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶37

nksuksa i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr rdksZa ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr ,oa mijksDr foospu dh jks'kuh esa fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k esa izFke n`"V;k ,slh dksbZ fof/kd =qfV izrhr ugha gksrh gS ftlds vk/kkj ij Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 227 ds rgr iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk bLrseky dj vk{ksfir vkns'k esa gLr{ksi fd;k tk ldsA

¶38

QyLo:i ;g fjV ;kfpdk xzg.kkFkZ izdze ij gh [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA rn~uqlkj LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA

¶39

¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr

¶40

,e 'kekZ@31

¶41

mijksDr fu.kZ;@vkns'k Hkkjr ljdkj dk jkti= la-1 fnukad 2 tuojh] 1999 esa izdkf'kr x`g ea=ky;] jktHkk"kk foHkkx ds ladYi@uksfVfQds'ku ds rgr lEcfU/kr Hkk"kk fgUnh esa [kqys U;k;ky; esa fy[kk;k x;kA

Natti Bai and Ors. v. Chhotulal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Natti Bai and Ors. v. Chhotulal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyam Sundar Bajaj and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Shyam Sundar Bajaj and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Om Prakash Meena and Ors. Vs Kunji Lal Meena

Makhan Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Cholamandalam Ms Gen Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Kailash and Others

Girraj Goyal Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.