Petitioner sought bail under Section 439 CrPC. Noting prior bail jump, the court allowed bail without deciding merits, subject to Trial Court satisfaction.
Petitioner admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B.Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 3340 / 2017
Makhan S/o Bharat Lal Sain B/c Nai, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Ritholi, PS Hindaun City, District Karauli, Raj. (At Present Detained in Sub Jail, Gangapur City).
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.,
For Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Mishra For Respondent : Mr. R.R. Baisla -P.P.
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Order
09/03/2017
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail in F.I.R. No. 376/2005 registered at Police Station Gangapur City, for offences under Sections 324 & 488 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Heard.
Although, petitioner had jumped bail, but now he is in custody since 21.02.2017.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this petition is allowed. Petitioner be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the Trial Court.
(SABINA)J.
Sudha/237
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant regular bail in a case where the petitioner had previously jumped bail.
Whether to decide merits of the case given the petitioner's custody status.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Makhan S/o Bharat Lal
State of Rajasthan
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
