Aside of aforesaid, Mr. Ravi Bhojak and Mr. Angad Mirdha counsel for respondents submitted that Section 16 of the Rajasthan Sports (Registration, Recognition and Regulation of Associations) Act, 2005 (hereafter the Act of 2005') provides that any dispute inter alia touching the constitution, management activity, election or claim to affiliation of any Sports Association, same shall be resolved through conciliation and arbitration. And the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act of 1996') is to apply to such conciliation and arbitration proceedings. It was submitted that a bare look at the prayer clause of the writ petition indicates that it relates to the AGM of Hockey Rajasthan and passing of resolutions. These acts comes within the words of “management activity”. The disputes are therefore amenable to arbitration under the Act of 1996. Therefore the petitioner has an alternative remedy under the Act of 1996. Besides of prohibition from interference in arbitrable matters by the courts under Section 5 thereof is also operative, they submitted. Reference has been made to the judgment in the case of Empire Jute Company
