Partly allowed

Devi Shankar Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC27 Jan 2017CRLMP/701/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single judge granted liberty to the accused petitioner to file a regular bail application under Section 216 CrPC. The trial court was directed to take the submitted documents on record and allow the petitioner to raise all points before deciding the application without influencing the final disposal by any interim order related to the bail proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to move application under s. 216 Cr.P.C.; directions issued to trial court to accept documents and not influence final decision indirectly.

Devi Shankar Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan — Public Procurement and Tenders | Rajasthan HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE-FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR*

¶2

S.B.Criminal Misccellaneous (Petition) No. 701 / 2010

Devi Shankar Sharma

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan

----Respondent

Mr. Ashok Gaur,

Mr. Ravikant

Mr. N.S.

?2+ ....,. ZF \ -..7

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

¶13

,-&Wp,,."+.:,
Jud' ' merit
4. <@ $ ; rp
''5% .-;id, 1, $4 -3%
, .: - &) &a
27/01/2017 yp,".2j . \k.QJ ," 2?&32322;. - - # wp@$--
Jr,;s~.;. _i Id,, . I; iX%y4(, y:!,?:: :.;Lc2g$ $ $? 'c:! $%!

¶14

'\ 's L"--" .p=.* ?,"*&-a:Q r- . Fw8 > $2 8:,q,i:..k'~ yT. Adr7*:: yw No.8, Jaipur City, Jaipu.rh aff:nm,,ng-r"th:ehe'or. . date 28.4.2008 d er passed by the trial court and also to discharge the accused petitioner from the charge levelled against him.

¶15

Mr. Ashok Gaur, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Ravi Kant Sharma, counsel appearing for the accused petitioner has submitted that the petitioner be given liberty to move an applicatiopunder section 216 Cr.P.C before the trial court. Sr.

¶16

Counsel further submitted that on submitting the application by the petitioner under section 216 Cr.P.C before the trial court, I same be first decided and thereafter, the trial court be directed to proceed in the matter. Sr. Counsel has further submitted that the documents which have been filed by the petitioner along-with the instant petition before this Court, the trial court be directed to take the same on record and it shall consider the same while - ;t 7 , tj 1&.3i BP# deciding the applicatio&tujnddrsetin,"l : A &, U Cr.iP.C. *' Sr. Counsel has /.f-% ii $.. I' - 4' @fkL L3a 2- further subm.i:tt:,ed. .that the petitioner be permittedts, raise all the ."\ p-9 , d 42*;*,1.1?. li 8 " points / hj,@ctions, \nX which the petitioner has taken '&;,&$ ,. .. instant ? ,) -,, jz3 'i. petitionisr. counsel has further requested that the trid~~~oiurt be directed not to influence d:ce$~f@a@l; . P??vT"% indirectly by any order or &-::* +;so- - >' 7 ;* +*" " ?V~?~I$ y @ b5.j &F$X ; ., J:;- -%?, /,d,f ', % \ . ?$,. ?: $*t::;,$",$? !;,,;g,t .@ &.;> directions passed/ issue~~@~~~~$j~~~~;rt~~:n~~.he~~~nstant ./,,:-..-. .ss"k :F--?F petition while . ?, ?A,. ;y *5 $. 3Q!$!+ r&A *&> &%4 , . ,f, id* :;, *'is% ,.: >-x .A, ,A? :9 ,-" & , ';ir gg:f~$4LY%-&t%$# d,. )e, @ <.;; fX.2 ;~@itjl;~ner under section 216

¶17

liberty given to the petitioner. ma?" mm % -: --." %,* ,"xy+;h"--s A .-. < _y_ fcw:?T;': 'A a A ?; , e, v.. * *a J yLyzp~,~, . .$$%? . < Ordered accordingly.

¶18

(MAFSH CHANDRA SHARMA)J.

Devi Shankar Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Devi Shankar Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Bharosi and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Jeet Singh Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Kayam Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Peetam Chand Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Lalaram @ Satyanarayan and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Dr Ram Singh Bhati Vs Shri Rajhans Upadhyay and Another