Disposed

Ram Bharosi and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Rajasthan HC25 Jan 2017CRLMP/11/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of connected quashing petitions filed under Section 482 CrPC by allowing counsel's joint request to direct the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter fairly, properly, and impartially if a challan has not been filed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter fairly, properly and impartially if challan has not been filed.

Ram Bharosi and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2017)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B.Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 515 / 2017

¶3

Dalchand S/o Kanha S/o Shri Bal Singh B/c Jatav, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Daulatgarh Tehsil & Police Station Roopwas, Distt. Bharatpur (raj.)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan Through PP

¶7

Deputy Inspector General of Police, Bharatpur

¶8

Superintendent of Police, Bharatpur

¶9

S.H.O. Police Station, Roopwas, Distt. Bharatpur (raj.)

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

Connected With

¶12

S.B.CRIMINAL MISCCELLANEOUS (PETITION) No. 11 / 2017

¶13

Ram Bharosi S/o Shri Teekaram B/c Jat, R/o Daulatgarh, Tehsil Roopwas, District Bharatpur, Raj.

¶14

Harbhan S/o Shri Teekaram B/c Jat, R/o Daulatgarh, Tehsil Roopwas, District Bharatpur, Raj.

¶15

Jogendra S/o Shri Teekaram B/c Jat, R/o Daulatgarh, Tehsil Roopwas, District Bharatpur, Raj.

¶16

Jagveer S/o Shri Teekaram B/c Jat, R/o Daulatgarh, Tehsil Roopwas, District Bharatpur, Raj.

¶17

Bhudev S/o Shri Ram Bharosi B/c Jat, R/o Daulatgarh, Tehsil Roopwas, District Bharatpur, Raj.

¶18

Kalua S/o Shri Ram Bharosi B/c Jat, R/o Daulatgarh, Tehsil Roopwas, District Bharatpur, Raj.

¶19

----Petitioners

¶20

Versus

¶21

State of Rajasthan Through P.P.

¶22

Daalchand S/o Shri Kanha B/c Jatav, R/o Village Daulatgarh, Tehsil Roopwas, District Bharatpur, Raj.

----Respondents

(2 of 2)

[CRLMP-515/2017]

Mr. T.C. Vyas for the complainant

¶27

Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya, for the accused persons

¶28

Dr. RS Shekhawat, PP for the State

¶29

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA Order

¶30

25/01/2017

¶31

Both these petitions have been filed under Section 482

¶32

CrPC.

¶33

Learned counsel for both the parties have requested to this Court that these petitions should be disposed of with direction to the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter fairly, properly and impartially, if challan has not been filed.

¶34

Although learned PP appearing for the State has opposed the same.

¶35

In view of the joint request made by learned counsel for both the parties, the same is allowed. Ordered accordingly.

¶36

Both the Cr. Misc. Petitions stand disposed of with the aforesaid direction.

¶37

(MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA)J.

¶38

DK/146-147

Ram Bharosi and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Bharosi and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kayam Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Laxmi Kant Gupta Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Rameshwar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Jeet Singh Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Peetam Chand Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Lalaram @ Satyanarayan and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.