No one appeared for the petitioner. The high court dismissed the miscellaneous criminal petition in want of prosecution due to non-compliance with registry defects and lack of interest by the petitioner.
Petition dismissed in want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition NO. 3446/2016
Ram Sahai Kumawat s/o Shri Ram Kumawat aged 39 years, r/o Village Pipla Tehsil Phagi District Jaipur
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor. --
2. Munshi Khan s/o Gulab Khan aged 31 years, by caste Musalman, r/o House No. 196, Tikkarmal Ka Rasta, Kishanpole Bazar, Jaipur.
... Respondents.
...
... DATE OF ORDER . . . 4th April, 2017
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA
None present for the Petitioner. Mr. Aladeen Khan, PP.
This misc. petition is pending since 03.06.2016 but the defects pointed out by the registry have not been removed. Today no one appeared on behalf of petitioner, therefore, it seems that petitioner is not interested in this misc, petition.
In view of it, the misc. petition is dismissed in want of prosecution.
[BANWARI LAL SHARMA], Jl
Ram Sahai Kumawat
State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor
Munshi Khan
BANWARI LAL SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
