Disposed

Meenu Kumari and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Rajasthan HC7 Apr 2017CRLW/118/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a writ petition by the newly married Meenu Kumari and Rajesh Kumar. The petitioners claimed danger to their life and liberty from those opposing their marriage. The court directed the SHO to ensure vigil for their safety without recognizing the marriage's validity or determining the petitioners' age.

What did the court decide?

Directed the SHO, Singhana, District Jhunjhunu to ensure necessary vigil that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners and their family members by those opposing the marriage.

Meenu Kumari and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Rajasthan HC (2017)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RA'JASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S. B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 118 / 2017

¶3

I. Meenu Kumari W/o Shri Rajesh Kumar D/o Shri Mahendra Singh B/c Jogi, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Maharana Khanpur, Tehsil Buhana, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.).

¶4

Rajesh Kumar S/o Shri Man Singh B/c Jogi, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Maharana Khanpur, Tehsil Buhana, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.1

¶5

z.. . - i-' 2. qrY %je Director General of Police, ~~i:& r

¶6

The Superintendent of,-:PqB;cei3 $, ay:o",isJ %. 5 Distt. J hunj hunu (Raj.)

¶7

----Respondents

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : D ',3+%p?4-; ,.-. ;;,,.d: a:+\va" F "<, - 2sA%$G;pt~~. ' =? ~~2i<:$g&%,g& ;;.il r;..y-. *.& . .. ;* **_.A_** c?;_ ,,,A+; ";, **_,Ae*@3>, HON'BLE MR. LAL SHARMA*

¶9

The instant Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India on behalf of the petitioners/newly married couple who are stated to be major, claiming that they have married against the wishes of their parents. They seek

¶10

.(2 of 3)

¶11

[CRLW-1-18/2017]

¶12

protection to their life and liberty as they apprehend danger to their life and the liberty at the hands of those, who are opposing the marriage.

¶13

Newly married couple is present in person they have been identified by Dr. Shivendra Singh Rathore, Advocate.

¶14

Ms. (Meenu Kumari) petitioner No. 1 appearing in person stated that she is major. She ,further stated that she had ..& &&* .%?{ $--?; & f" Y . 2 :, x--3 'Q " -1 ,& ,j performed marrigdg*e - hit6 petitioner No:'2 pizfl,(Rajesh Kumar) - ?5 P .> % '.%8k,', ' 2 i. according tib%fi@r own free will and accord and is liv:i.n:tjAkappily ./,y +$ with b3a q. him asa wfe. &%q

¶15

After hearin 1 petitioners, as well~.:+as$. '<,

¶16

"%\ %\ petitioners are found eQ;t$fJ~&;@i'potg@tl&~;&f ?% gi *A& sh"" ?,( ***:z** .xat ": 8 their life and liberty.

¶17

Consequently, the present petition stands disposed of by issuing a direction to the SHO, Singhana, District Jhunjhunu to ensure necessary vigil that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners and their family members at the hands of those, who are opposing the marriage. However, this order

¶18

shall not be constitute as recognition of validity of marriage between the parties and is issued without determining the age of petitioners on the ground that those, who are opposing the marriage, cannot cause harm to anyhndv

¶19

(BANWARI LAL SHARMA)J.

Meenu Kumari and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Meenu Kumari and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Verma Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Ram Sahai Kumawat Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Satyendra Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Banta Singh Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Hanif @ Kala Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Sarjeet Singh Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.