The petitioner failed to appear before the High Court. The registry had previously pointed out defects that remain unremoved. The petition was dismissed in want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 2345/2014
Sunita Verma d/o Shri Heera Lal Verma, R/o Mandawara, Tehsil Uniara, Police Station Aligarh, District Tonk (Raj.)
... Petitioner-Complainant.
...
Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director General of Police, Headquarter, Jaipur.
3. The Superintendent of Police, Tonk.
4. The Dy. S.P., Uniara, District Tonk.
5. The S.H.O., Police Station Aligarh, District Tonk.
... Non-Petitioners.
...
DATE OF ORDER
. . . . . . 2Sth March, 2017
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA
None present for the Petitioner. Mr. Aladeen Khan, PP.
This misc. petition is pending since 02.05.2014 but the defects pointed out by the registry have not been removed. Today no .' one appeared on behalf of petitioner, therefore, it seems that petitioner is not interested in this misc. petition.
In view of it, the misc. petition is dismissed in want of prosecution.
[BANWARI LAL SHARMA], J.
Sunita Verma
The State of Rajasthan
Banwari Lal Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
