persons, who attended the marriage of the petitioner and the respondent No.2. The trial court has found that all the witnesses, who attended the marriage of the petitioner and the respondent No.2 have clearly stated that at the time of marriage, the petitioner was very happy and there was no sign that she is solemnizing marriage under pressure. The trial court has further taken into consideration the photographs of the marriage and observed that from those photographs, it is evident that the petitioner was very happy at the time of her marriage with the respondent No.2. The trial court has further taken into consideration the statements of the neighbours of the respondent No.2 recorded by the police during the course of investigation and observed that in all those statements, the neighbours have clearly stated that they did not see that the petitioner was made captive by the respondent No.2 or his mother and they have seen that the petitioner was free to move out of the house during her stay with the respondent No.2. The trial court has further observed that the petitioner has delivered a child in Ummed Hospital, Jodhpur, where she remained admitted for some days, however, there also, she did not make any complaint to anybody about her ill-treatment by the respondent No.2 and his mother. The trial court has further observed that the petitioner is educated and mature lady and it is not believable that she was sexually assaulted by the respondent No.2 from 2005 to 2008 but she did not make any complaint to anybody, even to her parents, in this regard up to 2010. The trial court has also observed that the allegation against the respondent No.2 that he had forcibly solemnized marriage with the petitioner
