Petitioner sought anticipatory bail for an offence under Section 380 IPC. The court dismissed the petition, noting an earlier order dismissed the matter on merits with no change in circumstances.
Dismissed ahead of merits due to existing order dated 05.05.2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IInd Bail No. 9602 / 2017 lamil S/o Sirdar B/c Mev, R/o Village Chinawada PS Gopalgarh, District Bharatpur, Raj.
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Goyal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Meenakshi Pareek-P.P.
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Order
26/07/2017
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. No. 1812017 registered at Police Station Gopal Garh, Distt. Bharatpur, for offence under Section 380 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Heard.
Earlier petition filed by the petitioner for anticipatory bail was dismissed on merits by this Court vide order dated 05.05.2017. There is no change in circumstances warranting interference by this Court.
Dismissed.
(SABINA) 3.
Sud ha108
2 provisions across 2 enactments
lamil
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
SABINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
