Mr. Justice Sabina dismissed a bail petition under Section 438 CrPC 1973. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in an FIR involving obstruction of highway, injury to police, and other offences. The court held that the seriousness of allegations precluded grant of bail.
The petition for anticipatory bail was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B.Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 519 / 2017 Virendra Singh S/o Balbir Singh B/c Ahir, R/o Tadha, P.S. Bhiwadi, Distt. Alwar (Raj)
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.,
For Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Khandelwal For Respondent : Mr. R.R. Baisla-P.P.
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Order
13/01/2017
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. No. 250/2012 registered at Police Station Bhiwadi, Distt. Alwar for offences under Sections 147, 332, 353, 283 & 307 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 & Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public property Act, 1984.
Heard.
Prosecution story in brief is that the petitioner and his co-accused wanted to block the highway and had inflicted injuries on the police official. Petitioner is named in the FIR.
(2 of 2)
Keeping in view, the seriousness of allegations levelled against the petitioner, no ground for grant of anticipatory bail to him is made out.
Dismissed.
(SABINA)J.
Sudha/12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail is maintainable in view of the seriousness of the allegations levelled against the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Virendra Singh
State of Rajasthan
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
