Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner on instructions to counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B.Civil Contempt Petition No. 146 / 2017
Shyam Lal S/o Shri Ram Kishan Das, by Caste Mahajan, Aged About 66 Years, R/o 111, Samalka, New Anaj Mandi, Distirct Panipath, Haryana
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Azad Ahmed, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
Judgment
13/01/2017
Counsel, on instructions, wants to withdraw the instant writ petition.
The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed, as withdrawn, as prayed.
(AJAY RASTOGI)J.
Solanki DS, PS/194
Shyam Lal
Sh. Mukesh Kumar Sharma
Sh. Himanshu Gupta
Sh. Anil Kumar
AJAY RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
