This judgment grants anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC to the petitioner, a bonafide purchaser, in a case involving offences under Sections 407, 409, 411 and 379 IPC.
Petitioner allowed anticipatory bail and ordered to join investigation and obtain prior permission before leaving the country.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
ORDER
S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.15104/2016
Anuj Jain Son of Shri Shailesh Jain, by Caste Jain,, R/o 23/305, Bajewali Gali, Kesarganj, Ajmer (raj.)
V/s.
State of Rajasthan through P.P.
Date of Order: January 5, 2017
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Mr. Sri Ram Yadav, for the petitioner. Mr. R.R. Baisla, P.P. for the State.
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No.267/2016 registered at Police Station Alwar Gate, Ajmer, for offences u/S. 407, 409, 411 & 379 Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was bonafide purchaser for consideration. Petitioner has joined investigation.
Learned State Counsel has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this petition is allowed. In the event of arrest, petitioner be released on bail subject to satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. Petitioner shall join investigation as and when required by the police and shall not leave the country without
prior permission of the Court. Petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(SABINA),J. Tanwar/P.A. Item No.18
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in the present case.
Whether conditions of joining investigation and not leaving the country are applicable.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Anuj Jain
State of Rajasthan
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
