Allowed

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC21 Oct 2016SOSR/403/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court allowed a suspension of sentence application filed under Section 397 CrPC along with a criminal revision petition. The execution of the sentence awarded in the trial court and affirmed in the appellate court was suspended during the pendency of the revision, subject to the furnishing of a bond and sureties and an appearance before the Court.

What did the court decide?

Execution of sentence awarded in the trial court and affirmed in the appellate court shall remain suspended during the pendency of the revision petition, provided a bond of Rs. 2,00,000/- and two sure

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava Vs State of Rajasthan… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

SB Criminal Misc. Suspension for Sentence Application No. 403/2016

¶3

¶4

SB Criminal Revision Petition No.1428/2016

¶5

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

¶6

...Accused petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Rajasthan through PP

¶9

....Non Petitioner

¶10

Date of Order :: 25^th October, 2016

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

¶12

Mr. HS Sinsinwar, counsel for the petitioner Dr. RS Shekhawat, PP for the State

¶13

This application for suspension for sentence

¶14

has been filed by the petitioner(s) under Section 397 CrPC along-with the revision petition.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) has contended that the accused petitioner(s) is/are behind the bars. He has further contended that accused petitioner(s) was/were on bail during trial as well as during the pendency of appeal. He has annexed the Certificate under Rule 311 (3) of High Court Rules to this effect and has prayed that in this view of the matter, this suspension of sentence application should be allowed and execution of sentence awarded to the petitioner(s) should be

¶16

¶17

suspended during the pendency of the revision petition.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed same. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties and carefully perused the entire material available on record, this suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to accused petitioner(s) Pradeep Kumar Srivastava S/o Girish Chand Srivastava, by the trial court vide judgment dated 19.12.2015 passed in Case No. 4/2010 and affirmed by the appellate court vide judgment dated 24.8.2016 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 7/2016, shall remain suspended during the pendency of the revision petition, provided he/she/they furnish(es) a personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rs. Two Lakh) together with two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh) each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he/she/they shall appear before this Court on 25^th November, 2016 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶19

(Mahesh Chandra Sharma) J.

¶20

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohan Lal Saini Vs Shri Ravi Jain

Kamal Singh Vs Shri Ravi Jain

Ganesh Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Sher Singh Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Sunil Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Devendra Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp