Allowed

Ganesh v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC7 Oct 2016CRLMB/12944/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahesh Chandra Sharma allowed a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The court directed the release of the petitioner on personal bond with two sureties without examining the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Release of accused Ganesh S/o Vijaykaran on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on personal bond of Rs. 2 lakhs with two sureties of Rs. 1 lakh each.

Ganesh Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH

¶2

O R D E R

¶3

S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.12944/2016

¶4

(Ganesh S/o Sh.Vijaykaran, by caste Jat, R/o Kalidongri, PS-

¶5

Gandhinagar, Distt. Ajmer

¶6

(Presently confined in Central Jail, Ajmer)

¶7

Vs.

¶8

State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor

¶9

DATE OF ORDER ::::: 07/10/2016

¶10

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

¶11

Mr.Ashvin Garg, for the petitioner/s.

¶12

Mr.R.S.Shekhawat, Public Prosecutor for State.

¶13

This bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶14

Brief facts of the case are that an FIR No.238/2016 was registered at P.S. Gandhinagar, Distt. Ajmer for the offences mentioned therein against the accused petitioner. During the course of investigation, the accused petitioner was arrested. Thereafter the petitioner moved bail application before the learned Court below under Sec.439 Cr.P.C, who vide detailed impugned order dismissed the bail application. Hence this bail application has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case, he has nothing to do with the alleged crime, there is no case made out against the petitioner. It has also been contended that the accused petitioner is in judicial lockup since long, trial of the case is likely to take time, hence, the accused petitioner should be released on bail.

¶16

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶17

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

¶18

Therefore, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner Ganesh S/o Vijaykaran be released on

¶19

bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with aforementioned FIR, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lac) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lac) each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶20

(MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA)J.

¶21

Sandeep/-c/1

Ganesh v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganesh v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamlya Sansi Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Soram Alias Shoram and Others Vs Sukha Ram and Others

Panna Lal @ Vijendra Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Gaurav Vs State of Rajasthan through P.P.

Kamal Singh Vs Shri Ravi Jain

Mohan Lal Saini Vs Shri Ravi Jain