Allowed

Sher Singh v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC24 Oct 2016SOSR/468/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court granted suspension of sentence to the petitioner during the pendency of his criminal revision petition, requiring a personal bond and two sureties, with the order subject to appearance by a specified date.

What did the court decide?

Suspension of execution of sentence during pendency of revision petition; personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000/- each required.

Sher Singh Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

SB Criminal Misc. Suspension for Sentence Application No. 468/2016

¶3

¶4

SB Criminal Revision Petition No.1647/2016

¶5

Sher Singh, Son of Ramdutt, by caste Khati, aged 41 years, Resident of Chuli Kalan, Police Station Bhadukala, District Hisar (Haryana) (At present confined in District Jail, Jhunjhunu)

¶6

...Accused petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor

¶9

...Non Petitioner

¶10

Date of Order :: 24^th October, 2016

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

¶12

Mr. GS Rathore, counsel for the petitioner Mr. Rishi Raj Singh, PP for the State

¶13

This application for suspension for sentence

¶14

has been filed by the petitioner(s) under Section 397 readwith 389 CrPC along-with the revision petition.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) has contended that the accused petitioner(s) is/are behind the bars. He has further contended that accused petitioner(s) was/were on bail during trial as well as during the pendency of appeal. He has annexed the Certificate under Rule 311 (3) of High Court Rules to this effect and has prayed that in this view of the matter, this suspension

¶16

¶17

of sentence application should be allowed and execution of sentence awarded to the petitioner(s) should be suspended during the pendency of the revision petition.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed same. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties and carefully perused the entire material available on record, this suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to accused petitioner(s) Sher Singh S/o Ramdutt, by the trial court vide judgment dated 7.8.2013 passed in Cr. Case No. 131/1998 and affirmed by the appellate court vide judgment dated 15.9.2016 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 68/2013, shall remain suspended during the pendency of the revision petition, provided he/she/they furnish(es) a personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rs. Two Lakh) together with two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh) each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he/she/they shall appear before this Court on 24^th November, 2016 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶19

(Mahesh Chandra Sharma) J.

¶20

Sher Singh v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sher Singh v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Mohan Lal Saini Vs Shri Ravi Jain

Kamal Singh Vs Shri Ravi Jain

Sunil Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Devendra Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Deep Chand Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp