The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1237912016 with liberty to file a representation relying on the judgment in Bhanoda Vs. State of Rajasthan within two months.
Liberty to file a representation with liberty to dispose of the same with a speaking order within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 123791201 6
Gopal Lal Lakhara & Ors.
VERSUS
State of Rajasthan & Ors.
DATE OF ORDER , : a%( , - ; ..09/09/2016 HON:BLBM$,JIJSTIE;M.N. .. .., b$ % %.. ,-:- BHNDARI ksj .,:;. - -8
..' Mr. V.K. Sharma, for petitioners
pi . iiarned counsel prays for disposal of the writ pe"ti;on r.! % C with Liberty to make a representation to the respondents in'the Light of the judgment ofi-,tfi,k.'($$rt I..L,- - in the case of Jagdish ,>' . ,;en% & %,, ftc' , .,y --t ,. .:" 7%a. .b Bhanoda Vs. state-& O Geat RajastMan~.&;@6s a - fT ?.~"-.. .,.# z ye:!'... SB. Civil Writ Petition .Y , P : I.. ticr .hI V ..ti, .. ah)- -x.~ -!t? * ., .&.Y$. ,pp -.Ai C No.773/2009, deied~b$th@rncp,aL .,. , ..? .i'. &,+: yi:., 6eaLat Jodhpur on 2gth * & q: # .71".$%:, ;&..j?<$;@ .gC._ T " : " 9% ' .,*' "? .. '2., &'$!2 July, 2009. The repre_seh,taton.ff ir.,,.r.B~;,5j=.csw .-ilei.i ; 5'rsSd 5m3aybe considered by ..> . .@j:;.'...:q; .&,.+,.. . .,.:I -, ..L;3i :f~, ?' the respondents in tV@,lcghp,bfd ,. 'E the.judgment Gs. ,vts~..7 7 ;'!> (supra). ,. . > ~ >,% A' <' , - : . '%t.?,"=;:.' .. ,_L .. .;. r, In view of the Li&ted a **_D_** prajier wrctcpetition is disposed of , '1 _:t LI_ **6%** **_3_** "3 3) a _fr_ with the Liberty as &ayg,d ,:q" @for!i .a 918 , **tx 9** :dase of representation, **I(** **_6_** respondents are directed"fo~~ori~?&er~~ftie * _.-,&>4 & ,: #;;;,, 2.G * .. ,% same in the Light of s,,, %.A1 3. V~..' %k.+Y&.. ~1:i;a * _b - .r: i >- atz j .. n' , >$. .. - S" the directions givenlnthe~~ud$ment:i[sgpa)", @, c e,$$h-. ,....: -- :!y G." f .\ if it applies to the I 1 .. ?f,i L * *z:? r* \ &+d L.. t * facts of this case.$$& repries@n,ta.tio,m :.a:*...?.. wi ,is wb$@ .,-ye' be decided by a " ;. . * Ira : ,_ B >aks,s&.yf + - ">,. ' o's $,, speaking order within a per8d"ofttiYee months. A copy of the e, 'b yn) -Wsrrair.+p .-es <z-.ii;v.".c- : .... i k @ . .p.p ..,*Ii judgment (supra) @q~ld-also=;be.:encloYed along with the representation.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bhanoda Vs. State of Rajasthan & 66 othersReferred¶8
Gopal Lal Lakhara & Ors.
State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Justice M.N. Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
