Partly allowed

R S R T C v. Lal Chand

Rajasthan HC8 Sept 2016CMA/2460/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.2460/2007, the High Court of Rajasthan partly allowed the appeal against the Tribunal award. The Court held that the Tribunal failed to appreciate facts and grounds, quashed the award on specific issues, and remanded the matter for afresh decision after hearing all parties.

What did the court decide?

Impugned judgment and award quashed on specific issues; matter remanded to Tribunal for afresh decision after hearing; notice issued to parties for appearance on 05.12.2016.

R S R T C Vs Lal Chand — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Rajasthan HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR.

¶3

J U D G M E N T

¶4

S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.2460/2007

¶5

Rajasthan State Road Transport corporation through Chairman / Chief Manager, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur through duly constituted Attorney / L.A.

¶6

...Defendant/Appellant

¶7

Versus

¶8

Lal Chand s/o Shri Muktilal, Aged 29 years, by caste Bunker, r/o Gram Post Nathawala, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.)

¶9

Himmat Khan s/o Shri Sagru Khan, r/o Gram Nagar, Post Bhidasi, Thana Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.) (Driver Bus No. RJ-14P-6514)

¶10

...Defendants-Respondents

¶11

DATE OF JUDGMENT : 8.09.2016 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

¶12

Mr. Vinod Tyagi, counsel for appellant(s) Mr. Rahul Kamwar, counsel for the respondent/s

¶13

This appeal has been filed by the appellant(s) against the judgment and award passed by the learned Tribunal.

¶14

At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant(s) submits that the learned Tribunal while passing the impugned judgment and award has not taken into consideration the grounds which he has raised by way of aforesaid appeal(s). The finding of learned Tribunal on issue no. 1 & 4 is contrary to the material available on record. Thus, the impugned judgment and award passed by the learned Tribunal qua aforesaid issue(s) be quashed and set aside and the matter should be remanded to the learned Tribunal with the

¶15

¶16

direction to decide the matter afresh qua aforesaid issue(s) in the light of grounds which he has raised by way of aforesaid appeal(s).

¶17

On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent(s) though opposed the same but requested that the learned Tribunal may be directed to hear him/them at the time of deciding the matter afresh on the aforesaid issue/s, and he/they may be permitted to raise all the objections to the grounds as have been raised in this appeal.

¶18

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and carefully perused the relevant material on record including the impugned judgment and award.

¶19

In my considered view, the learned Tribunal while passing the impugned judgment and award has not appreciated the facts of the case and the grounds raised by the learned counsel for the appellant(s) by way of instant appeal(s) in a proper manner and passed the impugned judgment and award surreptitiously. Thus, the impugned judgment and award passed by the learned Tribunal needs interference by this court.

¶20

In the result, the appeal(s) is/are partly allowed; the impugned judgment and award passed by learned Tribunal qua aforesaid issue(s) is quashed and set aside and the matter is remanded to the Tribunal with the direction to decide the matter afresh qua aforesaid issue(s) as early as possible, in the light of grounds raised by the learned counsel for the appellant(s) by way of the aforesaid appeal(s) and the judgment(s) to be cited by learned counsel for the parties, if any, after issuing notice to all the concerned parties and giving opportunity of hearing to them.

¶21

However, it is made clear that if any amount has been received by the claimant(s) under the impugned award, the same shall not be

¶22

¶23

recovered from him/them till disposal of the claim petition by the learned Tribunal afresh qua aforesaid issue(s).

¶24

Both the parties have requested for a specific date for their appearance before the Tribunal, hence they are directed to appear before the learned Tribunal on 5.12.2016. Record, if any, be sent back.

¶25

(MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA)J.

¶26

R S R T C v. Lal Chand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R S R T C v. Lal Chand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hargovind Vs B O R Ajmer andORS

Smt Radha Thakur @ Brij Bala Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Dr Anita Malik Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Smt Phoola and Others Vs Gangaram and Others

Madan Mohan Vs State and Ors.

Ramesh Chand SHARMAandORS Vs State Elementary Educationors