Smt Sunita v. Prakash
Case brief
What is this about?
Single bench order dismissing a S.B. Civil Transfer Application as infructuous because the underlying Divorce Petition was dismissed for want of prosecution; order granted liberty to file fresh application.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed with liberty to file fresh application.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Transfer Application No.106/2014
Smt. Sunita v. Prakash
Date of Order :: 21.1.2016
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Mr. Rahul Sharma for Mr. Rajneesh Gupta for applicant. Dr. Bharti Sharma for respondent.
<><><>
Learned counsel for the applicant states that the instant Transfer Application has become infructuous for Divorce Petition Number 204 of 2013, which is pending before the Family Court, Dausa, was dismissed for want of prosecution.
In view of the statement made, the Transfer Application is dismissed as withdraw with liberty to the applicant to file fresh, if need be.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA), J.
Item No.119 Sunil/PA
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Smt. Sunita
- respondent
Prakash
Coram
VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CTA/106/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court