Allowed

Lokesh Kumar Sharma v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC7 Sept 2016CRLMB/10327/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C, directing the release of the accused on personal bond with two sureties without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C with a personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000 each.

Lokesh Kumar Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

¶2

AT JAIPUR BENCH

¶3

ORDER

¶4

S.B.CR. MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 10327/2016

¶5

Lokesh I<umar Sharma S/o Omprakash Sharma by caste Brahman, R/o Bagora, P.S. Udaipurwati, distt. Jhunjhunu, at present K/o Ghat Ke Balaji, Galta Road, P.S. Galta Gate, Jaipur.

¶6

Accused/Petitioner.

¶7

State of Rajasthan through P.P.

¶8

DATE OF ORDER

¶9

Respondent. ..... ..... 07/09/2016

¶10

HCBN'BLE MR.JUST1CE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

¶11

Ms. Shashi Sharma on behalf of Mr. Manoj Avasthi, for the petitioner/s.

¶12

Mr. Rishi Raj Singh, Public Prosecutor for State.

¶13

Mr. Anoop Dhand, for the complainant.

¶14

Mr. Madhowram, S.I., P.S. Udaypurwati, is present in court.

¶15

This bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C:. Brief facts of the case are that an FIR No. 1812016 was registered at P.S. Udaipurwati, Distt. Jhunjhunu for the offences mentioned therein against the accused petitioner. During the course of investigation, the accused petitioner(s) was/were arrested. Thereafter he/she/they moved the bail application before the trial court, who vide impugned order dismissed the same. Hence this bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner(s).

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) has contended that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case, he has nothing to do with the alleged crime, there is no case made out against the petitioner(s). It has also been contended that the accused petitioner(s) islare in judicial lockup since long and the conclusion of trial of the case is likely to take timerhence the accused petitioner(s) should be released on bail.

¶17

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed

¶18

the bail application.

¶19

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to release the petitioner(s) on bail. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner(s) Lokesh Kumar Sharma S/o Omprakash Sharma shall be released on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C, in connection with afore-mentioned FIR provided he/she/they furnish(es) a personal bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lac) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.l,00,000/(Rupees one lac) each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he/she/they shall appear before that court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when'called upon to do so.

Lokesh Kumar Sharma v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lokesh Kumar Sharma v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Urmila and Others Vs Surendra Kumar and Others

Jitesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Dalbir Singh Rana Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Durgashankar Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Deep Pratap Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rahul Singh Parmar Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp