Partly allowed

Kirti Kumar Khalle v. Lal Singh Jat and Ors.

Rajasthan HC22 Aug 2016CMA/3110/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court judges the Tribunal's judgment and award passed surreptitiously without appreciating facts and grounds adequately. It is partly allowed, quashing the impugned decision on specific issues and remanding the matter to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication after issuing notices to all parties.

What did the court decide?

Impugned judgment and award quashed on certain issues; matter remanded to Tribunal with direction to decide afresh after issuing notice and hearing parties by 5.12.2016.

Kirti Kumar Khalle Vs Lal Singh Jat and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR.

¶3

J U D G M E N T

¶4

S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.3110/2008 (Kirti Kumar Khalia Versus Lal Singh Jat & Ors.)

¶5

DATE OF JUDGMENT : 22.08.2016

¶6

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

¶7

Mr. Sandeep Mathur, counsel for appellant(s) Mr. Vizzy Agarwal, counsel for the respondent/s

¶8

This appeal has been filed by the appellant(s) against the judgment and award passed by the learned Tribunal.

¶9

At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant(s) submits that the learned Tribunal while passing the impugned judgment and award has not taken into consideration the grounds which he has raised by way of aforesaid appeal(s). The finding of learned Tribunal on issue no. 4 is contrary to the material available on record. Thus, the impugned judgment and award passed by the learned Tribunal qua aforesaid issue(s) be quashed and set aside and the matter should be remanded to the learned Tribunal with the direction to decide the matter afresh qua aforesaid issue(s) in the light of grounds which he has raised by way of aforesaid appeal(s).

¶10

On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent(s) though opposed the same but requested that the learned Tribunal may be directed to hear him/them at the time of deciding the matter afresh on the aforesaid issue/s, and he/they may be permitted to raise all the objections to the grounds as have been raised in this appeal.

¶11

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and carefully perused the relevant material on record including the impugned judgment and award.

¶12

¶13

In my considered view, the learned Tribunal while passing the impugned judgment and award has not appreciated the facts of the case and the grounds raised by the learned counsel for the appellant(s) by way of instant appeal(s) in a proper manner and passed the impugned judgment and award surreptitiously. Thus, the impugned judgment and award passed by the learned Tribunal needs interference by this court.

¶14

In the result, the appeal(s) is/are partly allowed; the impugned judgment and award passed by learned Tribunal qua aforesaid issue(s) is quashed and set aside and the matter is remanded to the Tribunal with the direction to decide the matter afresh qua aforesaid issue(s) as early as possible, in the light of grounds raised by the learned counsel for the appellant(s) by way of the aforesaid appeal(s) and the judgment(s) to be cited by learned counsel for the parties, if any, after issuing notice to all the concerned parties and giving opportunity of hearing to them.

¶15

Both the parties have requested for a specific date for their appearance before the Tribunal, hence they are directed to appear before the learned Tribunal on 5.12.2016.

¶16

Record, if any, be sent back.

¶17

However, it is made clear that if any amount has been received by the claimant(s) under the impugned award, the same shall not be recovered from him/them till disposal of the claim petition by the learned Tribunal afresh qua aforesaid issue(s).

¶18

(MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA)J.

¶19

Kirti Kumar Khalle v. Lal Singh Jat and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kirti Kumar Khalle v. Lal Singh Jat and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maina Kumari Nagar Vs State Women and Child Ors.

Raja Ram Vs State and Ors.

M D Db Corp Ltd. andANR Vs Mahendra Sharma

Uchhav Kanwar and Others Vs Richhpal Khan and Others

Ram Chandra Meena Vs Raj State Agricultural andORS

Rukmanand Sharma Vs State Education Departmentanr