Partly allowed

Vinod Kumar Jyotishi v. Addl Director Adm Prim and Sec Ed and Ot

Rajasthan HC18 Jul 2016CMA/2160/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed an appeal partly. It quashed and set aside the Tribunal's judgment regarding specific issues due to lack of appreciation of facts and grounds, remanding the matter for a fresh hearing after notice to all parties. A date for appearance before the Tribunal was fixed.

What did the court decide?

Impugned judgment and award on specific issues quashed; matter remanded to Tribunal for fresh disposal after notice.

Vinod Kumar Jyotishi Vs Addl Director Adm Prim… — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

¶3

JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR.

¶4

J U D G M E N T

¶5

S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.2160/2012 (Vinod Kumar Jyotishi Versus The Addl. Director ADM & Ors.)

¶6

DATE OF JUDGMENT : 18.07.2016

¶7

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

¶8

Mr. Prashant Joshi, counsel for appellant(s) Mr. Jinesh Jain, counsel for the respondent(s)

¶9

This appeal has been filed by the appellant(s) against the judgment and award passed by the learned Tribunal.

¶10

At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant(s) submits that the learned Tribunal while passing the impugned judgment and award has not taken into consideration the grounds which he has raised by way of aforesaid appeal(s). The finding of learned Tribunal on issue no. 3 is contrary to the material available on record. Thus, the impugned judgment and award passed by the learned Tribunal qua aforesaid issue(s) be quashed and set aside and the matter should be remanded to the learned Tribunal with the direction to decide the matter afresh qua aforesaid issue(s) in the light of grounds which he has raised by way of aforesaid appeal(s).

¶11

On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent/s though opposed the same but requested that the learned Tribunal may be directed to hear him/them at the time of deciding the matter afresh on the aforesaid issue/s, and he may be permitted to raise all the objections of the grounds as have been raised in this appeal.

¶12

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and carefully perused the relevant material on record including the impugned judgment and award.

¶13

¶14

In my considered view, the learned Tribunal while passing the impugned judgment and award has not appreciated the facts of the case and the grounds raised by the learned counsel for the appellant(s) by way of instant appeal(s) in a proper manner and passed the impugned judgment and award surreptitiously. Thus, the impugned judgment and award passed by the learned Tribunal needs interference by this court.

¶15

In the result, the appeal(s) is/are partly allowed; the impugned judgment and award passed by learned Tribunal qua aforesaid issue(s) is quashed and set aside and the matter is remanded to the Tribunal with the direction to decide the matter afresh qua aforesaid issue(s) as early as possible , in the light of grounds raised by the learned counsel for the appellant(s) by way of the aforesaid appeal(s) and the judgment(s) to be cited by learned counsel for the parties, if any, after issuing notice to all the concerned parties and giving opportunity of hearing to them.

¶16

Both the parties have requested for a specific date for their appearance before the Tribunal, hence they are directed to appear before the learned Tribunal on 5.10.2016.

¶17

Record, if any, be sent back.

¶18

(MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA)J.

¶19

¶20

All corrections made in the judgment / order have been incorporated in the judgment / order being E-mailed.

¶21

Dilip Khandelwal PA

Vinod Kumar Jyotishi v. Addl Director Adm Prim and Sec Ed and Ot

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Kumar Jyotishi v. Addl Director Adm Prim and Sec Ed and Ot

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Atul Jain Vs Shri a P Kala

Satya Narayan Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Jagdish Prasad Vs Bihari Lal and Ors.

Smt Tara Devi and Others Vs Sanwar Mal Kumawat and Others

Suresh Chand Vs Rohitash Jat and Others