Dismissed

Saraswati Adarsh Vidya Anr. v. Veenu Gupta and Others

Rajasthan HC13 May 2016CCP/456/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.456/2012, the petitioner requested withdrawal of the petition after complying with the impugned order but objecting to the reasons for rejection. The High Court dismissed the contempt petition as withdrawn with liberty to assail the specific order later.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to assail the rejection order of the petitioners' representation through a lawful remedy.

Saraswati Adarsh Vidya Anr. Vs Veenu Gupta… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Rajasthan HC (2016)

¶1

SBCCP No.456/2012. Saraswati Adarsh Vid yape et h & An r. Vs. Sh r i As hok Sampatram & O rs. 1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR

¶3

RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶4

O R D E R

¶5

S.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.456/2012. IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.3040/2011.

¶6

Saraswati Adarsh Vidyapeeth & Anr. Vs. Shri Ashok Sampatram & Ors.

¶7

Date of Order

¶8

: May 13, 2016.

¶9

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA

¶10

Shri Anoop Agarwal for the petitioners.

¶11

Shri J.M. Saxena, Additional Advocate General for State. **********

¶12

BY THE COURT:-

¶13

On the joint request made by the counsel for the parties, hearing of the present contempt petition is preponed from 19/07/2016 to today and the contempt petition is taken on the board.

¶14

In the instant contempt petition preferred under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, a grievance has been made by the petitioners that the order dated 26/08/2011 passed by the learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil Writ petition No.3040/2011 has not been complied with.

¶15

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has very fairly submitted that in compliance of the order dated 26/08/2011, the respondents have decided representation of the petitioners. However, learned counsel submitted that the reasons given in the order rejecting

¶16

SBCCP No.456/2012. Saraswati Adarsh Vid yape et h & An r. Vs. Sh r i As hok Sampatram & O rs. 2

¶17

representation of the petitioners are palpably wrong and same are not legally tenable. Thus, learned counsel submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to assail the order passed by the respondents on the representation filed by the petitioners by availing lawful remedy in accordance with the provisions of law.

¶18

As prayed, the present contempt petition is, hereby, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.

¶19

(Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) J.

¶20

Anil Goyal PS/33

Saraswati Adarsh Vidya Anr. v. Veenu Gupta and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saraswati Adarsh Vidya Anr. v. Veenu Gupta and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagannath and Ors. Vs State and Ors.

Guddi Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Hemant Palawat Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Ramesh Chand Sahu Vs Ravi Kumar Surpur and Others

Shyam Lal and Others Vs Mrs Veenu Gupta and Others

Vikram Godara @ Vikrant Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp