Petitioners sought to quash a contempt petition arguing that the underlying order was modified by a Division Bench, rendering the present petition infructuous. The court accepted this submission and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Contempt petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR
RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
O R D E R
S.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.414/2013.
Shyam Lal & Ors. Vs. Mrs.Veenu Gupta & Ors.
Date of Order : May 13, 2016.
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA
Mr.Tarun Choudhary for the petitioners.
Mr.Rajendra Prasad, Additional Advocate General for the State.
Mr.S.N. Kumawat for the Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer.
BY THE COURT:-
Learned counsel for the petitioners has
submitted that since the order passed by the learned Single Judge compliance of which has been sought was subsequently modified by the Division Bench of this Court in D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.657/2013 : Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer through its Secretary Vs. Bhumika Vyas & Ors. , this contempt petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such.
Ordered accordingly.
(Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) J.
An il Goyal PS/50
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer through its Secretary Vs. Bhumika Vyas & Ors.Referred¶13
D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.657/2013 : Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer through its Secretary Vs. Bhumika Vyas & Ors.
Shyam Lal & Ors.
Mrs.Veenu Gupta & Ors.
Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
