The petitioner questioned the reduction of grant-in-aid by the State. The Court held the relief infructuous as the entire payable amount had already been released to the institution.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous having regard to the release of the entire amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4629/2000 Rajasthan Mahila Vidhyalaya Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Date of Order :: 24/09/2015
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA
Mr. Akhilesh Rajpurohit, for the petitioner. Mr. Rishab Tayal on behalf of Mr. K.L.Thakur, Additional Advocate General for the respondents.
By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has questioned the action of the State Government in reducing the amount of grant-in-aid payable in accordance with the provisions of the Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions (Recognition, Grant-in-aid and Service Conditions Etc.) Rules, 1993.
It is to be noticed that on 27.7.01, the statement was made by learned Additional Advocate General before this Court that 75% of grant-in-aid was earlier released to the petitioner-Institution and subsequent thereto, remaining 25% of grant-in-aid has also been released.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the entire amount of grant-in-aid payable already stands released to the petitioner-Institution and therefore, nothing survives for consideration of this Court in the present writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(SANGEET LODHA), J.
rp s-6
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajasthan Mahila Vidhyalaya
State of Rajasthan
Sangeet Lodha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
