This order dismisses two writ petitions for being barred by delay and laches. The court noted that the appeals were not maintainable as the original orders creating mutation entries were never challenged.
Writ petitions are dismissed in limine.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1. CHUNARAM VS. DHARMA RAM & ORS. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7580/15)
2. CHUNARAM VS. DHARMA RAM & ORS. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7713/15)
Dated:- 3.9.15.
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA
Mr.Sushil Solanki, for the petitioner.
2
view of the matter, the writ petitions preferred by the petitioner badly suffer from delay and laches and deserve to be dismissed on this count alone.
(SANGEET LODHA),J.
Aditya/
3 issues framed by the court
Whether writ petitions suffering from inordinate delay and laches should be dismissed.
Whether appeals preferred against mutation entries are maintainable without challenging the original order.
Whether interference is warranted under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chunaram
Dharma Ram
Sangeet Lodha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
