This court disposed of a writ petition by issue of notice, recording acceptance of notice by the Additional Advocate General, and stating that the matter was covered by a previous order passed in another writ petition on the same facts and terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
5
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
ORDER
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 2877/2015
Santosh Kumar
Vs. State of Rajasthan & ors.
Date of Order : : 27.04.2015
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR
Mr. M.C. Bishnoi, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Vikash Choudhary on behalf of Mr. S.S. Ladrecha, A.A.G., for the respondents.
<><><><>
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) :-
Issue notice.
Mr. Vikash Choudhary appearing for Mr. S.S. Ladrecha, Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
Learned counsel for the parties agree that the matter is squarely covered by the Order dated 20.04.2015 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2522/2015 (Sohan Kanwar Naruka & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.).
In view of the above, the present writ petition is also disposed of in the same terms as S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2522/2015.
(NIRMALJIT KAUR), J.
IK
Santosh Kumar
State of Rajasthan
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
