A writ petition seeking relief regarding termination services was dismissed as rendered infructuous because the impugned termination order was withdrawn.
The petition is dismissed as the impugned order of termination has been withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
ORDER
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1749/2015
Geeta Devi
vs.
Institute of Advance Studies in Education & Anr.
Date of Order
: : 08.04.2015
HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR
Mr. Sandeep Shah, for the petitioner. Mr. Hemant Shrimali, for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents states that
the impugned order of termination has been withdrawn.
In view of the same, the present petition is
rendered infructuous.
Dismissed accordingly.
(NIRMALJIT KAUR), J.
Anil/50
Geeta Devi
Institute of Advance Studies in Education & Anr.
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
