The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the second appeal as infructuous, holding that the decree has been executed with possession handed over to the respondent during execution proceedings.
Second appeal dismissed as rendered infructuous; order sent to parties and trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.169/2006 Omaram @ Om Prakash Vs. Gopi Kishan Judgement dated 25/02/2015
1 of 5
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
::: J U D G E M E N T :::
S.B. CIVIL SECOND APPEAL No.169/2006
Omaram @ Om Prakash S/o Pancharam Jat Vs. Gopi Kishan S/o Mishrilalji Maheshwari
Date of Judgement : 25/02/2015.
P R E S E N T
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI
Appearance :
Mr. Shanker S. Rajpurohit on behalf of Mr. Sunil Beniwal, for the appellant/plaintiff. Mr. P.C. Singhvi, for the respondent/defendant.
BY THE COURT :
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.169/2006 Omaram @ Om Prakash Vs. Gopi Kishan Judgement dated 25/02/2015
2 of 5
the suit filed by the plaintiff/appellant for declaration and injunction was dismissed in respect of suit land in question situated in Village Asop, which land was claimed to be in possession of the appellant since long time, but the counter claim of the defendant, Gopi Kishan, was decreed in his favour.
“1. व�द� न� पत�व�द� क� ववरद घ�षण� एव� स��य� तनष�ध�ज� क� व�द प�श ककय�, ज�सम" व�द� क� अभ%वचन ह( कक ग�म आस�प म" अडव�ड, क� ब�स म" व�द� क� भमज.कय� क� प/श�(न� पट�स/द व कब��स/द ब�ड� आय� ह/आ ह(। ज�सक� उतर म" ब�ड� क� तनक�ल व आम र�स��, दक9ण म" मदनल�ल झ�वर क� मक�न, प;व< म" न�हर� ग�रधनर�म व पज>म म" न�मल झ�वर क� मक�न ह(। पट� म" उ.ल�ख@� पडAस समय क� अन/स�र बदल�� रह� ह(। ब�ड� कB न�र� नकश� म" म�क< ए.ब�.स�.ड�.ई.एफ.��.एच. दश�<य� गय� ह(। ब�ड� क� पट� सG�G समय स� ववधधक रप स� ��र� ककय� गय� ह(। ज�स पर व�द� क� अल�व� ककस� क� हक व हहसस� नह�� ह(। हदन��क 17.10.95 क� पत�व�द� न� व�द� क� व�दगस� ब�ड� स� �बरदस�� ब�द@ल करन� कB धमकB द� और कह� कक पत�व�द� क� प�स व�दगस� ब�ड� क� पट� ह( , ज�सस� वह व�द� क� �बरदस�� ब�द@ल कर द�ग� और प/भलस इमद�द क� स�� ब�द@ल कर द�ग�। पत�व�द� क� दस��व � क�ई फ�L, बन�वG�, ��ल� व छ/ पक� छ/ पक� �(य�र ककय� गय� ह(। अ�: व�दगस� ब�ड� व�द� कB भमज.कय� क� पट�स/द व कब��स/द घ�वष� ककय� ��व� ��� पत�व�द� द�र� �� %� दस��व व�दगस� ब�ड� क� बन�य� गय� हO, उनह� श;नय घ�वष� ककय� ��व�
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.169/2006 Omaram @ Om Prakash Vs. Gopi Kishan Judgement dated 25/02/2015
3 of 5
��� व�दगस� ब�ड� क� व�द� क� उपय�ग व उप%�ग म" पत�व�द� हस�9�प नह�� कर� व न ह� अनय स� करव�व�।
आद�श
व�द� क� व�द ब�ब� घ�षण� एव� स��य� तनष�ध�ज� ववरद पत�व�द� सवयय @�रर� ककय� ���� ह( ��� पत�व�द� क� क�उनGर कल�म सवयय डडकB ककय� ���� ह(, व�द� न� पत�व�द� कB %;भम पर �� कब�� ककय� ह( , उस कब�� क� �तक�ल हG�व� ��� पत�व�द� क� कब��स/द� पल�G पत�व�द� कB भमज.कय� क� घ�वष� ककय� ���� ह(। डडकB पच�< म/त�<ब ह�।
Sd/(एम. क�. भस�हल) भसववल नय�य�ध�श (क.@.) प�प�ड।"
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.169/2006 Omaram @ Om Prakash Vs. Gopi Kishan Judgement dated 25/02/2015
अप�ल��L कB यह अप�ल असव�क�र कB ��कर अध�नस� नय�य�लय क� तनण<य व डडकB पच�< हदन��क 22.3.2001 क� प/ष ककय� ���� ह(। @च�< अप�ल प9क�र�न सवय� वहन कर"ग�। तनण<य अन/स�र डडकB पच�< �(य�र ककय� ��व�।"
Sd/(यशप�ल भस�ह चAधर�) अपर ज�ल� नय�य�ध�श स�.2, ��धप/र।"
respondent/defendant submits that while rejecting the plaintiff's suit, the learned trial court had decreed the counter suit filed by the respondent/defendant, Gopi Kishan. He further submitted that in the execution proceedings, the decree passed by learned trial court while decreeing the respondent's counter suit, the possession of the land in dispute has been handed over to the respondent-Gopi Singh, therefore, the present second appeal filed by the appellant/plantiffOmaram @ Om Prakash has been rendered infructuous.
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.169/2006 Omaram @ Om Prakash Vs. Gopi Kishan Judgement dated 25/02/2015
5 of 5
(Dr. VINEET KOTHARI), J.
DJ/17
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present second appeal is maintainable when the execution proceedings resulted in possession being handed over to the respondent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Omaram @ Om Prakash
Gopi Kishan
Vineet Kothari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
