Lrs of Hukma v. Suraj Mal
Case brief
What is this about?
An appeal against a specific performance decree was dismissed as infructuous due to a settlement between the parties, with leave to return a Rs.6000 deposit to the plaintiff.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as infructuous; Rs.6,000 deposit to be refunded to the respondent.
What the court decided
S.B. Civil First Appeal No.53/1999 Hukma (D) through LR's Vs. Surajmal Judgement dated 24/02/2015
1 of 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
::: J U D G E M E N T :::
S.B. CIVIL FIRST APPEAL No.53/1990
Hukma S/o Sh. Jeetaji Chaudhary (D) through LR's Vs.
Suraj Mal S/o Premchand
Date of Judgement : 24/02/2015.
P R E S E N T
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI
Appearance :
Mr. Jitendra Chopra, for the appellant/defendant. Mr. M.C. Bhoot, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arpit Bhoot, for the respondent/plaintiff.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Hukma S/o Jeetaji Chaudhary (D) through LR's
- respondent
Surajmal S/o Premchand
Coram
VINEET KOTHARI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CFA/53/1990
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court