The court restored a dismissed civil revision petition to its original number subject to the petitioner depositing a fee of Rs. 1,000 with the State Legal Services Authority.
Civil Revision Petition No. 152/2008 restored to file subject to deposit of Rs. 1,000.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAI PUR BENCH, JAI PUR
O R D E R
S. B. Ci vi l Rest or at i on Appl i cat i on No. 71/ 2012 I n S. B. Ci vi l Revi si on pet i t i on no 152/ 2008
Dat e of Or der : 13/ 01/ 2015
HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE J. K. RANKA
Mr . BB Oj ha f or t he pet i t i oner . Mr . Daul at Shar ma f or t he r spondent s
Thi s Ci vi l Rest or at i on appl i cat i on has been f i l ed t o r est or e t he ci vi l r evi si on pet i t i on whi ch was di smi ssed by t he per empt or y or der of t hi s cour t on 22/ 10/ 2011 and t her eaf t er t he or der was passed by t he r egi st r y on 15. 12. 2011 as t he same was not compl i ed wi t h.
Havi ng hear d counsel f or t he pet i t i oner and l ooki ng t o t he aver ment s ment i oned i n t he r est or at i on appl i cat i on whi ch i s dul y suppor t ed by t he af f i davi t , t he r evi si on pet i t i on i s r est or ed t o i t s or i gi nal number subj ect t o deposi t cost of Rs. 1, 000/ - wi t h t he Raj ast han
St at e Legal Ser vi ces Aut hor i t y, Jai pur wi t hi n t wo weeks. I f t he sai d amount i s deposi t ed and t he counsel f or t he appl i cant f ur ni shes a r ecei pt t her eof i n t he Regi st r y, t he mat t er be l i st ed t her eaf t er .
Om 26
l l cor r ect i ons made i n t he j udgment / or der have been i ncor por at ed i n t he j udgment / or der bei ng e- mai l ed.
2
Om pr akash P. A.
Om Prakash P.A.
Respondents
J. K. Ranka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
