This high court order dismissed a civil writ petition seeking temporary injunction. The court held that a Civil Misc. Appeal is the appropriate remedy against an interim injunction order, making the writ petition an unsuitable alternative.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAI PUR BENCH, JAI PUR
O R D E R
S. B. Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on no. 13328/ 2014
Lakhpat and or s vs Smt Kaj odi
Dat e of Or der : 09/ 01/ 2015
HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE J. K. RANKA
Mr . Dhr uv At r i and Mr Teekar am Meena f or t he pet i t i oner s
i nj unct i on under Or der 39 Rul es 1 & 2 CPC was r ej ect ed.
2
pur sue t he avai l abl e r emedy i n accor dance wi t h l aw.
( J. K. RANKA) J.
Om 51
Al l cor r ect i ons made i n t he j udgment / or der have been
i ncor por at ed i n t he j udgment / or der bei ng e- mai l ed.
Om pr akash P. A.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Civil Misc. Appeal against an interim injunction order is the appropriate remedy rather than a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Lakhpat and ors
Smt Kajodi
J. K. RANKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
