Allowed

Smt Kamla Devi v. Mahendra Singh

Rajasthan HC9 Jan 2015CMAP/4/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a misc. appeal, the High Court of Rajasthan allowed a correction application filed by the appellant. The court substituted the impugned order to correct an arithmetical error in the calculation of compensation, enhancing the amount from Rs. 3,59,000 to Rs. 5,21,500 along with interest.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order dated 04/07/2014 was modified to enhance compensation to Rs. 5,21,500 with 6% interest, to be distributed via MIS and bank drafts.

Smt Kamla Devi Vs Mahendra Singh — Rajasthan HC (2015) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAI PUR BENCH, JAI PUR

¶3

S. B. Ci vi l Mi sc. Appl i cat i on No. 4/ 2015 I n S. B. Ci vi l Mi sc. Appeal No. 1112/ 2009

¶4

Smt . Kaml a Devi Vs. Mahendr a Si ngh & Or s.

¶5

Dat e of Or der : 09/ 01/ 2015

¶6

HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE J. K. RANKA

¶7

Mr . Bhanu Pr akash Ver ma, f or t he appel l ant s.

¶8

I nst ant mi sc. appl i cat i on has been f i l ed f or maki ng necessar y cor r ect i on/ r ect i f i cat i on i n t he cal cul at i on mi st ake caused whi l e maki ng comput at i on of t he compensat i on whi l e passi ng or der dt 04/ 07/ 2014 deci di ng t he Ci vi l Mi sc. Appeal No. 1112/ 2009.

¶9

Counsel f or t he appel l ant s- cl ai mant s cont ends t hat i n Par a 16 of t he or der dt . 04/ 07/ 2014, whi l e r ecomput i ng t he compensat i on, t he I ncome under I t em ( A) was adopt ed at Rs. 3, 500/ - PM and 50% as f ut ur e pr ospect under I t em ( B) was al so r i ght l y shown at Rs. 1, 750/ - pm but whi l e t ot al l i ng of t he amount under I t em No. ( A) and ( B) , due t o t ypogr aphi cal er r or , t he amount was shown at Rs. 4, 250/ - pm whi l e as a mat t er of f act , upon addi ng amount of t he t wo I t ems ( A & B) , t he t ot al comes t o Rs. 5250/ - whi ch r equi r es t o be cor r ect ed and consequent l y f ur t her comput at i on/ cal cul at i on of t he compensat i on al so accor di ngl y r equi r es t o be cor r ect ed/ modi f i ed accor di ngl y by t r eat i ng t he t ot al of I t em No. A & B t o t he t une of Rs. 5250/ - i nst ead of Rs. 4, 250/ - .

¶10

I have gone t hr ough t he or der passed on 04/ 07/ 2014 and on per usal of t he same, I not i ce t hat t her e i s a

¶11

¶12

t ot al i ng er r or i n t he or der dt . 04/ 07/ 2014 as r i ght l y poi nt ed out by t he Counsel f or t he appl i cant .

¶13

Accor di ngl y, ear l i er par a 16, 17 & 18 of t he or der dt . 04/ 07/ 2014 be subst i t ut ed/ modi f i ed and be r ead as under : -

¶14

“ 16. I n vi ew of t he above, t he compensat i on i s r ecomput ed as under : -

¶15

( A) I ncome Rs. 3, 500/ - PM ( B) 50% of above t o be added as f ut ur e pr ospect Rs. 1, 750/ - PM A+B = Rs. 5, 250/ - PM ( C) Deduct i on of ¼ on sel f expenses Rs. 1, 312/ - PM Bal ance A+B- C ______________Rs. 3, 938/ - PM ( D) Mul t i pl i er 3938x12x18 = Rs. 8, 50, 608/ - ( E) Loss of Consor t i um RS. 25, 000/ - ( F) Loss of l ove and af f ect i on of par ent s. Rs. 20, 000/ - ( G) Loss of l ove and af f ect i on of chi l d Rs. 10, 000/ - ( F) Funer al expenses Rs. 5, 000/ - Tot al Rs. 9, 10, 608/ - Less- Compensat i on awar ded by Tr i bunal Rs. 3, 89, 200/ - Amount enhanced Rs. 5, 21, 408/ -

¶16

or say Rs. 5, 21, 500/ - ”

¶17

Consequent l y, i n t he l i ght of t he r e- cal cul at i on of t he amount ( supr a) , t he compensat i on enhanced woul d be at Rs. 5, 21, 500/ - i nst ead of 3, 59, 000/ - as hel d ear l i er i n par a 17.

¶18

¶19

Consequent l y, par a 18 i s al so modi f i ed t o t he ext ent i . e. and be r ead as under : -

¶20

“ Thus t he appeal i s par t l y al l owed. The i mpugned or der / awar d dt . 04/ 07/ 2014 i s modi f i ed t o t he ext ent t hat t he enhanced amount of compensat i on of Rs. 5, 21, 500/ - wi t h i nt er est @ 6% wi l l be pai d by t he non- pet i t i oner s. The i nt er est wi l l however be al l owed f r om t he dat e of f i l i ng of t he awar d bef or e t he Tr i bunal . Out of t he above enhanced amount wi t h i nt er est so comput ed r ounded of f t o t he near est t housands, t he Tr i bunal shal l deposi t Rs. 2, 50, 000/ - i n t he name of wi f e of t he deceased; Rs. 50, 000/ - i n t he name of t he son of t he deceased; Rs. 1, 00, 000/ - & Rs. 1, 00, 000/ - i n t he name of t he f at her and mot her of t he deceased i n t he Mont hl y I ncome Scheme ( MI S) i n t he near est post of f i ce f or a per i od of f i ve year s. The i nt er est accr ui ng on mont h t o mont h basi s wi l l be deposi t ed i n t he savi ng account wi t h t he same post of f i ce wi t h per mi ssi on t o wi t hdr aw t he mont hl y i nt er est / quar t er l y i nt er est as per t he scheme of t he post of f i ce. The bal ance of t he r emai ni ng amount wi t h i nt er est woul d be di sbur sed t o t he wi f e by t he Tr i bunal by bank dr af t / banker s cheque. I t i s made cl ear t hat t he appel l ant s wi l l be al l owed i nt er est onl y as af or esai d of t he enhanced amount so deposi t ed i n MI S and wi l l not be al l owed t o t ake a l oan on t he same f r om t he post of f i ce or r ai se l oan on t he sai d MI S. I n t he case of Mi nor son, t he MI S wi l l be r enewed f r om t i me t o t i me t i l l he becomes maj or . The above exer ci se t o done wi t hi n

¶21

¶22

t wo mont hs. No cost s. ”

¶23

The mi sc. appl i cat i on so f ar as cal cul at i on mi st ake has been not i ced st ands al l owed as af or esai d.

¶24

S. Kumawat - 16

¶25

Cer t i f i cat e- Al l cor r ect i ons made i n t he j udgment / or der have been i ncor por at ed i n t he j udgment / or der bei ng e- mai l ed.

¶26

S. Kumawat Jr . P. A

Smt Kamla Devi v. Mahendra Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Kamla Devi v. Mahendra Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Deepika Sharma Vs Smt Sushial and Ors.

Smt Geeta Devi Vs Sampat Badhara and Ors.

Smt Kamlesh Sachdeva Vs Rajender Prasad Gupta Anr.

Smt Meena Vs Hakimuddin and Ors.

M/S Saboo Cement Industries Ajmer Vs a C T O WARD-5 Ajmer

M/S Saboo Cement Industries Ajmer Vs a C T O WARD-5 Ajmer