3 . It is sought to be submitted by learned counsel Dr. P.C. Jain for the petitioners that the respondent-plaintiff had stated in the plaint itself that the lands in questions were under acquisition, and therefore the civil court did not have the jurisdiction to decide the said suit. Relying upon various decisions of the Supreme Court, he submitted that the land acquisition proceedings could not have been challenged in the civil court by way of suit. The Court does not find any substance in the said submissions. As transpiring from the averments made in the plaint, according to the plaintiff, the lands in question were released from the acquisition proceedings, however the petitioners-defendants were out to obstruct the possession of the plaintiff in respect of the said lands. The respondent-plaintiff has not challenged any acquisition proceedings in the suit. Even otherwise, it would be a matter of evidence to be led by both the parties as to whether the plaintiff is entitled to the permanent injunction as prayed for in the suit. The learned counsel for the petitioners has failed to point out any law which would bar the suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff.
