the fact that poor victim appellant is languishing for his life, I deem it just and appropriate to adjudicate the issue in this appeal to mitigate the hardship of the victim’s family. As the facts of the case are so glaring and the appellant is under treatment, remanding the matter back to the Tribunal for its decision afresh may not be conducive and it would unnecessarily delay the process of fresh adjudication. To abate the agony of the appellant and his parents, I feel persuaded to decide the appeal on merits in the light of available material and additional evidence taken on record. Therefore, in totality, taking into account umpteen materials available on record and clinching additional evidence supporting the cause of the appellant, I feel persuaded to allow this appeal to the extent of enhancing the amount of compensation for future medical treatment and expenses. Thus, explicating the facts with objectivity that appellant’s future treatment is to be carried out at Beijing, for which estimated expenditure is likely to be handsome and may go upto 58,000 US Dollars, a benevolent view is need of the hour to meet the ends of justice. As such, considering the ratio decidendi of the verdicts of Hon’ble Apex Court in G. Ravindranath and Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences (supra), the amount of compensation for future medical
