Writ petition was disposed of following a compromise arrived at between the parties and produced before the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9120/2012
RSRTC & Anr. vs. Addl. District and Session Judge No.3 & Anr.
Date of Order :: 4th March, 2014
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi
Mr. R.K. Daga, for the petitioners. Mr. Vinod Tamoliya, for the respondent.
The learned counsel Mr. R.K. Daga for the petitioners, and the learned counsel Mr. Vinod Tamoliya for the respondent jointly state that compromise has been arrived at between the parties, and the same has been produced before the Trial Court. The counsel for the petitioners also places on record a copy of the said compromise before this Court. In view of the said compromise, the present petition does not survive, and the same stands disposed of accordingly.
(Bela M. Trivedi) J.
Sanjay Solanki JrPA
Sanjay SolankiJrPA41 “All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.” Sanjay Solanki Jr. Personal Assistant
RSRTC & Anr.
Addl. District and Session Judge No.3 & Anr.
Bela M. Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
