Revision petition dismissed as infructuous because the sale-deed was already executed by the executing court according to the respondent's submission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR
O R D E R
S.B. CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.33/2010
(Smt. Ketki Vs. Seth Bahadur & Anr.)
Date of Order : 03.03.2014
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI
Mr. R.K. Gaur, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, for the respondents.
BY THE COURT
The learned counsel, Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, for the respondents states that the present petition has become infructuous as the sale-deed has already been executed in view of the order passed by the Additional Civil Judge (JD) and Judicial Magistrate First Class, No.1, Dholpur i.e. the executing court.
The learned counsel, Mr. R.K. Gaur, for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already taken the case file and therefore he does not have any instruction in the matter.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents, the revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
MS/-
All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.- Manoj Solanki, Jr. P.A.
Ketki
Seth Bahadur & Anr.
Bela M. Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
