In a civil contempt petition, the petitioner stated that the earlier order has been complied with. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous and discharged the notices.
Contempt petition dismissed as infructuous; notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR
O R D E R IN
S.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.1139/2013 IN
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11622/2012 (Ganga Ram Jatav Vs. Deepak Upreti & Ors.)
Date of Order : 26.09.2014
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA
Mr. Narendra Mishra, for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjay K. Sharma, Addl.G.C. for the respondents. BY THE COURT
Counsel for the petitioner states that the present contempt petition has become infructuous as the order passed by
this Court on 29.03.2013 has been complied with.
In view of statement made, the contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous. Notices discharged.
(ALOK SHARMA), J MS/-
All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.- Manoj Solanki, P.A.
Ganga Ram Jatav
Deepak Upreti & Ors.
Allok Shama
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
