Disposed

Chandra Prakash Agarwal v. State Education Departmentors

Rajasthan HC8 Mar 2013CW/3455/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner was granted liberty to file a representation to the respondents to be considered for a post in light of a prior judgment of this Court. The representation must be filed within one month and is subject to the final outcome of an appeal against the prior judgment.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to make a representation within one month to be considered in light of a prior judgment, subject to eligibility and pending appeal.

Chandra Prakash Agarwal Vs State Education… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3455/2013

¶3

Chandra Prakash Agrawal

¶4

Versus

¶5

State of Rajasthan & Ors.

¶6

DATE OF ORDER : 08/03/2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI

¶7

Mr. Chandra Prakash Agrawal, Petitioner present in person

¶8

¶9

Learned counsel submits that issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in the case of Naresh Kumar Sharma & Ors. Versus State of Rajasthan & Anr. ( SBCWP No.3414/2009 & 3 other connected petitions ). The aforesaid decision was given after hearing both the parties, thus petitioner/s may be given liberty to make a representation to respondents to consider his/their case in the light of the judgment aforesaid.

¶10

In view of the prayer made, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. If any representation is made, respondents are directed to look into the same and if case of petitioner/s is covered by the judgment in the case of Naresh Kumar Sharma (supra), his/their case may also be considered in the light of the directions given in the judgment aforesaid subject to other eligibility and the merit. It may be in his/their category. Consideration aforesaid may be made within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order and representation.

¶11

The consideration would, however, be made to the extent of posts advertised and the order passed in this case would remain subject to final outcome of the appeal as it is recently informed that an appeal has been preferred in the case supra, thus petitioner/s has/have agreed to abide the final outcome of the appeal. Accordingly, if judgment in the case supra is reversed, then this order would be rendered ineffective.

¶12

[M.N.BHANDARI], J.

¶13

FRBOHRA/3455CWP2013.doc

¶14

Certificate:

¶15

“All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.” FATEH RAJ BOHRA, P.A.

Chandra Prakash Agarwal v. State Education Departmentors

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandra Prakash Agarwal v. State Education Departmentors

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kanhaiya Lal Dhaker and Ors. Vs State Education Departmentors

Dinesh Kumar Vs State Education Departmentors

Rajesh Kumar Vs State Education Dep and Anr.

Suresh Kumar Vs State Education Departmentanr

Mushtaq Hussain Vs State Education Departmentanr

Dwarka Prasad Yadav Vs State Panchayati Raj Dep Ors.