Ramavtar v. State of Rajasthan through P.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single Judge Court allowed bail to Rama Nath u/s 439 CrPC after hearing counsel for the Special and Public Prosecutors, relying on the public prosecutor's observation that the offence was cognizable.
What did the court decide?
Bail granted to applicant with condition to furnish surety and appear for trial.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
राजः थान उच ् च � यायालय पीठ , जयपुर
आदेश
एकल पीठ दाि� डक ूक�ण� जमानत ूाथ�ना पऽ सं� या8954/2009 रामावतार बनाम राजः थान रा� य।
�दनांक:5/11/2009
माननीय � यायािधपित ौी महेशच� ि शमा�
ौी ड�.के.द�ि�त अिधव� ता वाः ते ूाथ� उप0
ौी ूद�प ौीमाल लोक अिभयोजक वाः ते राजः थान रा� य उप0
अिभयु� त-ूाथ� �ारा यह जमानत का ाथ�ना पऽ अ� तग�त धारा 439 द� ड ू�बया सं�हता ूः तुत �कया गया है और इस पर अिभयु� त-ूाथ� के �व�ान अिधव� ता एवं �व�ान लोक अिभयोजक क� बहस सुनी गयी तथा दौराने बहस ूः तुत दः तावेज/केस डायर� का अवलोकन �कया गया।ू
ाथ� के �व�ान अिधव� ता का कथन है �क इस ूकरण म� सहअिभयु� त क� जमानत का आवेदन पऽ इस � यायालय क� सम� वय पीठ के आदेश �दनांक 27 अगः त,2008 �ारा ः वीकार �कया जा चुका है और ूाथ� का मामला उससे िभ� न नह�ं है। उनका यह भी कथन है �क ूाथ� के �व�� आरो�पत अपराध द� डनायक �ारा �वचारणीय है। अत: ूाथ� को जमानत पर �रहा �कया जावे।
�व�ान लोक अिभयोजक ने ूाथ�ना पऽ का �वरोध �कया।
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC in a warrant case based on the Special Public Prosecutor's representation and the objections raised by the Public Prosecutor.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rama Nath
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahesh Chandra Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/8954/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court