Dismissed

Surendra Singh v. State

Rajasthan HC6 Nov 2006CW/6331/1997

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses a writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings. The court held no ground to interfere as acquisition was completed with an award passed in 1999 and some petitioners already received land allotment. Others were advised to approach the appropriate forum for relief or challenge the award traditionally.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition and stay application disposed of; petitioners advised to approach appropriate forum for allotment or to challenge award traditionally.

Surendra Singh Vs State — Specific Performance | Rajasthan HC (2006)

¶1

-:1:-

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR

¶3

ORDER

¶4

S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6331/1997.

¶5

Surendra Singh & Others. VERSUS State of Raj. & Ors.

¶6

06.11.2006.

¶7

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH

¶8

Mr.Ripudaman Singh, for the petitioners.
Mr.Ajeet Bhandari, for the respondents.

¶9

*****

¶10

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondents submits that in the matter acquisition
proceedings have already been completed and the award
has been passed way back in the year 1999. It is also
submitted that the petitioners No.5, 6 and 7 who
submitted before the respondents that they may be
allotted land in lieu of compensation and the land was
allotted to them in pursuance of their application.

¶11

In view of the above, I do not find any good ground
to interfere in the writ jurisdiction under Article 226
of the Constitution of India. In case the petitioners
No.1 to 4 are also desirous of taking the similar relief
from the respondents, they may approach the respondents
by means of the application and the respondents shall
consider the same and pass orders in accordance with
law. In case the petitioners No.1 to 4 are not satisfied
with the award passed, they would be free to challenge
the same or seek enhancement in accordance with law. The
time spent in the pendency of the writ petition may be
condoned on making an application before the appropriate
forum.

¶12

-:2:-

¶13

The writ petition as well as the stay application
stand disposed of, as above.

¶14

(DALIP SINGH),J.

¶15

Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.

Surendra Singh v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Singh v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Kathat Paultary Farm Kusha Vs Gopal Singh

Vidhya Devi Modi Vs State and Ors.

Rajendra Singh Vs State and Ors.

Virender Kumar Vs State and Ors.

Shree Cements Ltd. Vs Ind. Dev.Bank of India

Saudan Singh Vs U I T and Ors.