In a civil contempt petition, the petitioner informed the court that the respondents had stayed auction proceedings and he did not wish to press the petition. Consequently, the court discharged the notices and disposed of the matter.
Notices against the respondents were discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
ORDER
S.B.CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.60/2002.
IN
S.B.CIVIL RESTORATION APPLICATION NO.197/2000.
IN
S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1403/1996.
M/s.Kathat Paultary Farm Village Kushalpura.
VERSUS
Shri Gopal Singh Karnawat & Others.
02.11.2006.
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH
Mr.Rajendra Prasad, for the petitioner.
Mr.Sunil Jain on behalf of
Mr.R.P.Garg, for the respondents.
*****
Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the
respondents have stayed the auction proceedings.
In view of the above, he does not want to press the
contempt petition.
In view of the above, the notices stand discharged
and the contempt petition is disposed of.
(DALIP SINGH),J.
Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.
M/s. Kathat Paultary Farm
Shri Gopal Singh Karnawat & Others
Dalip Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court