Disposed¶20

Karanbeer Singh v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC26 May 2026LPA/1509/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karanbeer Singh v. State of Haryana and Others, LPA-1509-2026(O&M), High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, decision 26.05.2026, coram Ashwani Kumar Mishra and Rohit Kapoor, JJ. LPA against Single Judge dismissal of writ petition challenging State transfer-policy clarifications; appeal disposed of on withdrawal after cognate writ petitions (CWP-7092-2026, Vijay Chaudhary and others vs. State of Haryana and another) were disposed of on 21.05.2026 with liberty to the State to recast its policy; no merits adjudicated; no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed of on withdrawal of the appeal and the writ petition, with liberty to the State to formulate a fresh policy in accordance with law; pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of ¶20

Karanbeer Singh Vs State of Haryana and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

LPA-1509-2026(O&M)

¶2

-1-

¶3

131 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

LPA-1509-2026(O&M) Date of decision:26.05.2026

¶5

KARANBEER SINGH ...Appellant

¶6

Vs.

¶7

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

¶8

...Respondents

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR

¶10

Present: Mr. Sunil K. Nehra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arjun Dosanj, Advocate for the appellant.

¶11

Mr. Nitin Kaushal, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

¶12

¶13

ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (Oral)

¶14

Certain clarifications issued by the State with regard to the transfer policy assailed before the learned Single Judge and the writ petition has been dismissed. The transfer policy itself was challenged before this Court in a series of writ petitions, which have ultimately been disposed of vide order dated 21.05.2026 in CWP-7092-2026 titled as ‘Vijay Chaudhary and others vs. State of Haryana and another' with liberty to the State Government to have a re-look at its policy and formulate the relevant considerations.

¶15

On account of such subsequent orders passed, the cause raised in the writ before the learned Single Judge itself has lost its significance.

¶16

Faced with such a situation, learned Senior counsel for the appellant comes up with the prayer to withdraw the present appeal as also the writ petition with liberty to the State to formulate a fresh policy in accordance

¶17

NEERAJ 2026.05.30 12:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶18

LPA-1509-2026(O&M) -2-

¶19

with law.

¶20