Mamta Yadav v. Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC14 Jul 2026CWP/2990/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWP-2990-2024 | High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh | Decided 14.07.2026 | Coram: Vikas Bahl, J. (oral) and Subhas Mehla, J. | Petitioner: Mamta Yadav | Respondents: Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP) and others | Subject: alternative plot in lieu of Plot No.580, Sector 11, Urban Estate Bahadurgarh (among disputed plots); challenge to HSVP policies dated 15.11.2021 and 24.11.2022 excluding subsequent purchasers/re-allottees; order dated 06.09.2023 rejecting legal notice dated 19.04.2021 | Disposition: disposed with liberty to revive | Statute: Articles 226/227, Constitution of India.

What did the court decide?

Disposal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to revive it in case any cause survives or arises in future; no direction for allotment or possession issued at this stage. ¶¶24

Mamta Yadav Vs Haryana Shehri Vikas… — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Disposal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to revive it in case any cause survives or arises in future; no direction for allotment or possession issued at this stage.

¶¶24

Issue for consideration

Whether the policies dated 15.11.2021 and 24.11.2022 issued by respondent No.1, under which a subsequent purchaser/re-allottee is not considered eligible for allotment of an alternative plot in lieu of the original plot, are liable to be quashed. +1 more

¶¶14

Ratio / Principle

In view of the respondents-HSVP's submission that the proposal for allotment of an alternate plot in lieu of the disputed Sector-11, Bahadurgarh plots (including the petitioner's plot) had been sent to higher authorities for approval, the Court disposed of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to revive it in case any cause survives or arises in future.

¶¶24

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Mamta Yadav (petitioner) filed CWP-2990-2024 under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India against Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP) and others, seeking (i) quashing of HSVP policies dated 15.11.2021 and 24.11.2022, under which a subsequent purchaser/re-allottee is not considered eligible for allotment of an alternative plot in lieu of the original plot; (ii) quashing of HSVP's order dated 06.09.2023 rejecting her legal notice dated 19.04.2021 seeking such allotment; and (iii) mandamus for possession of an alternate plot in lieu of original allotted Plot No.580 (Category Residential, 6 marlas), Sector 11, Urban Estate Bahadurgarh, now among the disputed plots of Sector 11, Bahadurgarh. At the hearing, counsel for respondents-HSVP stated that the proposal for allotment of an alternate plot in lieu of the disputed Sector-11 plots (including the petitioner's plot) had been sent to higher authorities for approval, to be obtained expeditiously. Vikas Bahl and Subhas Mehla, JJ., disposed of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to revive it if any cause survives or arises in future.

¶1

CWP-2990-2024 [1]

¶2

239

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CWP-2990-2024 Date of decision: 14.07.2026

Mamta Yadav

...Petitioner

Versus

Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran and others ...Respondents

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA

¶10

Present: Mr. Rao Ajender Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Deepak Sabherwal, Advocate for the respondents-HSVP.

¶12

¶13

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

¶14

In the present writ petition, following prayers have been made:- “Civil Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing of policies dated 15.11.2021 (Annexure P-12) and 24.11.2022 (Annexure P-13) issued by respondent No.1, as per which, a subsequent purchaser/re-allottee is not considered eligible for allotment of an alternative plot in lieu of original plot; AND

¶15

for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari for quashing of impugned order dated 06.09.2023 (Annexure P-11) passed by respondent No.1 whereby legal notice dated 19.04.2021 (Annexure P-7) sent by the petitioner for allotment of an alternative plot had been rejected; AND

¶16

for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the

¶17

PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.16 09:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶18

CWP-2990-2024 [2]

¶19

respondents to give possession of an alternate plot to the petitioner in lieu of original allotted Plot No.580, Category Residential measuring 6 marlas situated in Sector 11, Urban Estate Bahadurgarh, which is now among disputed plots of Sector 11, Bahadurgarh;

¶20

¶21

Issue any other writ, order or direction as deemed fit, just and proper in the peculiar facts and circumstances of present case.”

¶22

Learned counsel for the respondents-HSVP has submitted that the proposal for allotment of an alternate plot in lieu of disputed plots of Sector-11, Bahadurgarh (including plot of the petitioner) has been sent to the higher authorities for necessary approval and every endeavour would be made by the authorities for final approval and the said final approval be taken as expeditiously as possible.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the same, the present writ petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioner to revive the same in case any cause survives or arises in future.

¶24