Writ petition challenging letters and seeking continuation of consolidation proceedings, pending since 1992 awaiting decision of a Regular Second Appeal. With joint consent, the petition was disposed of with liberty to all parties to revive it after the RSA is decided; the interim stay order of 22.09.1992 continues meanwhile.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP-12868-1992 (O&M) [1]
101
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-12868-1992 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.07.2026
Jeewan Singh and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA
Present: Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl. A.G. Haryana. Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate for respondent No.2.
VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
“Mr. V.K. Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. N.K. Jain, Advocate.
PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.14 09:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CWP-12868-1992 (O&M) [2]
Notice of motion for 4.11.1992.
Further proceedings in pursuance of order Annexure P- 7 and P-8 are stayed. 22.9.1992”
“Present: None for the applicants.
We have gone through the averments contained in the application and are of the opinion that C.W.P. No. 12868 of 1992 deserves to be heard only after the decision of R.S.A. No. 1936 of 1987.
Hence, the prayer for hearing of the writ petition along with R.S.A. No. 1936 of 1987 is rejected.
The writ petition be listed for hearing after the decision of the said Regular Second Appeal.
The C.M. is disposed of accordingly. 25.9.2003”
passed the following order:-
“Present: Mr. Veer Imaan Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana.
* * *
Learned counsel for the parties submit that RSA-19361987 is pending for final decision.
To await the final decision in the aforesaid appeal, hearing of the present petition is deferred to 13.07.2026. 04.02.2026”
PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.14 09:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CWP-12868-1992 (O&M) [3]
further jointly submitted that the present writ petition be disposed of at this stage but liberty be granted to all the parties to revive the same after decision in the said R.S.A. No.1936 of 1987 in case any cause survives or in case any other subsequent events occur. It is further stated that the interim order dated 22.09.1992 be continued till the time the RSA is decided.
(VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE
(SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE
13.07.2026
Pawan
Whether speaking/reasoned:Yes/No Whether reportable:Yes/No
PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.14 09:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jeewan Singh and another
State of Haryana and others
Vikas Bahl
Subhas Mehla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
