Writ petition against a cooperative societies order dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear despite the case being called twice. Respondent contended an alternative remedy existed under Section 115 of the Haryana Cooperative Societies Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(PHHC010448042021) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
211
CWP-29421-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.07.2026
Dharambir Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
The Registrar Cooperative Socities Haryana and Others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : None for the petitioner
Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Addl. AG, Haryana
Mr. R.S. Sihag and Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Advocates for respondent No.2
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
1 . None had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the last occasion.
The position remains the same even today, despite the case having been called out twice.
2 . Learned counsel for respondent No.2 states that the present petition
has even otherwise been not maintainable in view of there being remedy under Section 115 of Haryana Cooperative Societies Act against Annexure P-1.
3 . Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
20.07.2026 M.Kamra
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
MOHIT 2026.07.20 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition was maintainable given an alternative remedy under Section 115 of the Haryana Cooperative Societies Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dharambir Singh
The Registrar Cooperative Societies Haryana
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
