Disposed

Suresh Kumar & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC17 Jul 2026CWP/5561/2002

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a non-reasoned oral order discharging the Punjab and Haryana High Court to dispose of a similar pending petition based on a subsequent judgment, directing authorities to decide the claim within six months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider petitioners' claim in light of a recent judgment and decide the matter within 6 months of the order date.

Suresh Kumar & Ors. Vs State of Haryana… — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

202 CWP-5561-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.07.2026

¶3

SURESH KUMAR & ORS.

¶4

... Petitioners

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

¶7

... Respondents

¶8

**CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. ******

¶9

Present: Ms. Eliza Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶10

Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

¶11

Ms. Parbeen Kumar Dharwal, Advocate for Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Advocate for respondent No.5. ****

¶12

AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)

¶13

Learned counsel submits that the petitioners are similarly circumstanced to the petitioners in CWP-7339 of 2001 titled as ‘Naresh Kumar and another Versus State of Haryana and Others’, which was mentioned in the index of the instant petition specifically stating therein to be involving the same question of law and pending for 29.05.2002, which now stands decided vide judgment/order dated 06.08.2025, against which no LPA has been filed. She thus prays that their claim may also be considered in light of the aforesaid judgment.

¶14

Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the limited prayer made.

¶15

RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.17 16:42 I am the author of this document

¶16

CWP-5561-2002 (O&M)

¶17

-2-

¶18

In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to look into the claim of the petitioners taking note of the judgment referred to hereinabove and decide the same within a period of 06 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon.

¶19

Other misc. application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of accordingly.

¶20

(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JULY 17, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶21

RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.17 16:42 I am the author of this document

Suresh Kumar & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Kumar & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishan Vs the State of Haryana and Others

Pala Singh and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

Harikesh Kumar Vs State of Haryana through the Chief Secretary to Government of Haryana

Satish Kumar and Ors. Vs Uhbvn Ltd. and Ors.

Nahar Singh Vs Director General of Police Haryana and Ors.

Nathi Ram Vs Haryana Tourism Corporation and Anr.